redwolf writes:
Basically, somebody who wanted to go on believing that modern man had evolved would have to come up with some new hominid, closer to us (than the neanderthal) in both time and morphology, to claim as a human ancestor.
I don't mean to whip out logic on you, but what you've done is commit a fallacy called
appeal to ignorance.
You are basically saying that just because we haven't found a homonid close enough to modern man that such a homonid doesn't exist. Drawing a conclusion from an incomplete record is as ignorant as anyone can get.
Edited-wrong info.
[This message has been edited Lam, 05-03-2004]
The Laminator
™ Version 4.2
