RAZD told me that "you can (usually) search the site for topic of interest (Neander mtDNA) and find a thread to ask your question if it is not already coveed ..unfortunately this is temporarily down"
What helped RAZD with asking this .. the UNWRITTEN or "draft" portions sent for the administration only in an e-mail (this was in RAZD's email box) to the mod/admin. "A technical question should be by it's very nature something that doesn't always make a nice message, my point has to do with why something is doomed to be lost in the clutter or going through this process again I'm only asking a question. I so thankful for your suggest and Thanks for your url but it doesn't include the research from the latter half of late-2004 the url wouldn't be the site for topic of interest (Neandertal mtDNA) You said something about " ..find a thread to ask your question if it is not about mitochondrial DNA extracted from Neanderthal" Okay? Alright, the fact remains that in all the pages this is more about a unique mechanism of Gene sequencing but maybe you didn't caught that. I know Percy hasn't either. Once more it is a remote Lab-Rat's chatter about a reference to 'a hybridizatized Neandertal sequences' unduely picked-up by Gish about the methodology 'entirely "due to highly "technical reasons" is now deemed a controversial analyse means'" There's not some small hair to split you'll failed to caught from my comments, am I wrong ? Wouldn't you know it not mentioned in IGOR V. OVCHINNIKOV, ANDERS GTHERSTRM, GALINA P. ROMANOVA, VITALIY M. KHARITONOV, KERSTIN LIDN & WILLIAM GOODWIN Journal Paper Look, it is less self indulgence and more seeking a answer in that highly "specialized" field that the rank and file couldn't hope to answer (Frankly I feel almost robbed by this whole experience) I have not decided to separate my grievance with Forum in the role your administrators have taken with the negative experience of not just asking the question If you want to do anything about this at all. Get whatever you can from this question research methodologies and NOT mtDNA sequences from *GTHERSTRM [also to include Kring's earlier study] and post it yourself or pass it on to someone that cares. This isn't the place to get into how Gish not surprisingly is seen as a propagandist for pseudoscience, many times Icr not only demonstrates a complete unsuitability or characteristics their role but are victims of pseudoscience propagandist, I was the last person to want to ask about something they were so interested in, but do they have a point about the unique mechanism of mt-DNA sequencing ??? This is the last time you will be hearing about this question That's to clue you in, the fact is the last time you will be hearing from me most definitely! Oh, Do NOT expect I'm going to pay for a writing seminar just to ask a question Good Day! (HUFF, HUFF, HUFF)
™ Version 4.2
