Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the evolution of clothes?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 10 of 161 (173251)
01-03-2005 2:21 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by coffee_addict
01-03-2005 2:15 AM


Now the question of why we became "ashamed" of our nakedness is a whole other issue.
Same reason - it's cold outside. If clothes are necessary for survival, then societies evolve to make sure that their members wear the requisite clothing.
The specifics are, of course, cultural. Obviously, not every culture agrees what one should be "ashamed" of not covering up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 01-03-2005 2:15 AM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by coffee_addict, posted 01-03-2005 1:41 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 24 of 161 (173756)
01-04-2005 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by contracycle
01-04-2005 11:40 AM


That is, just about the only part of our body to NOT be concealed with a socially constructed set of symbols and signals is the face itself.
Eyes and noses don't work too well when you cover them up; were it not for that I suspect these burkas would lack even the gauzy bit over the face.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by contracycle, posted 01-04-2005 11:40 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by contracycle, posted 01-05-2005 10:44 AM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024