Is the bible authoritive and truly inspired?

Yes, it was. Since we don't have the originals, I guess that leaves the option of god lying in your false dichotomy. Have you ever thought of another option, like, men changed it regardless of god's promise? And how would you determine what the "correct" ones are, since you have no originals to compare them to? You don't know, you weren't there, and nobody was there to record them at that point in time. America did change it's money. Since it did in fact change, both in value as in looks, I wouldn't call it ridiculous. Since it is you who is like this, I would suggest you stop projecting. No, since it was already changed in the past. We are not critisizing god's word, we are critisizing the people who wrote it down and changed it.

Yes it was (getting tired of blind assertion yet?) Yes he did, he preserved it, men were the once that chnaged it. Please point me to the original manuscripts then. But we have examples of differeing texts of the same passage. We can't say which ones were the "original" ones, so we know it was changed. Then he's a liar. There are a lot of denominations that aren't made anymore (half cents, for example, or bills larger than $ 100). And dollars today are printed on cotton, not on paper. No I'm not. I think I know what argument I am making. We have however several versions of texts, which proves they were changed. Sure, we just don't know what those words were. I never said god didn't keep his promise, I said men changed it regardless. You can't know what the original words were. God could've easily preserved it, it's just that we have no way of telling what the original texts were. you cannot claim they were unchanged, you don't know if they were.

No you're not. You're making stuff up. Actually, it's you who know nothing of it, I've been in "the know" since my birth, having a close relationship to all things supernatural. You're quite right, dicussing with you (an unbeliever) is very pointless. I enjoy it nonetheless. Quite right, we see you do this all the time. Not srtange, since you are, in fact, an unbeliever. Then he isn't the only one lying. Of course not, you, being an unbeliever, will deny anything I say anyway, even though it's the truth. No you don't. No, you want to believe your personal, and very wrong, beliefs about god and so don't want to belief the truth and lead people away from it. You don't have any more details, let alone the original texts.

Yes, and they are not called unicorns.Edited by Huntard, : did quote wrong

The adultery itself went pretty sweetly for him. You know what didn't go over well? Getting caught at it.Also, I've been in the habit of breaking some of god's moral laws as well, I have not stoned any disobedient children, nor have I beat any slaves to within an inch of their lives. I am having a pretty sweet life though. Guess his moral laws aren't all that they are cracked up to be.

Since that will never happen, I guess there will be no evidence forthcoming.

So, what you're saying is that god has a very important message to convey to humanity, a message everyone must hear, yet he failed so completely at communicating that message that only a small portion of all people actually understood it? Man, I don't know how your god will feel about calling him incompetent...

Hey, aren't you supposed to be suspended? (See Message 91)