TOE and the Reasons for Doubt

Before you go too far with that, remember that Dawkin's original program didn't do "locking" (i.e. it didn't specifically keep correct letters from being incorrect again) - it was even more random than that.It simply found which offspring of any particular random sequence was "more correct" - in studying the original output still preserved (and by running the darn program) you can see for yourself that correct letters do become incorrect and fluctuate as the process continues.Still, it is vastly quicker than the random-monkey-bashing odds.

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure which example you gave that you're talking about now.Evolution itself doesn't have a "there", but Dawkin's program is a toy and doesn't simulate biological evolution.It simulates and displays the power of random selection.If you try to say evolution wants to create a crocoduck, or a teenage mutant ninja turtle, or that you should see pokemons in the real world, you are mistaken and you will get called on it.If you try to say evolution can't get from a fly to a bat, you'll be told that no - it can't, and it doesn't need to.Frankly, you appear to misunderstand the weasel program and what it means, still.Sorry.