Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 75 of 154 (115065)
06-14-2004 12:28 PM
|
Reply to: Message 74 by RAZD 06-13-2004 5:29 PM
|
|
Re: Wanted: productive discussion!
Physical teleology is not physciotheology but there is little discussion of natural purpose in particular as to why it might not be needed to think of Noah's Ark as one spot if the duty was to explain the final cause of agriculture exporing the growing of food in Venus atmosphere and the civilization of man On Mars. Of course if one rejected physciotheology outright there would not be a necessary connection if one stuck ONLY to Wolfram type universaility no matter the worship BEHAVIOR and you could eat the Fladers' credit plastic V card! Dont do it!! I suppose I used to associate Biblical Creationism with the latter and Scientific Creationism a former but the same would apply in you division. Best. Brad.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 74 by RAZD, posted 06-13-2004 5:29 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|