Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   At what point should we look for a non-materialistic explanation?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 160 (537685)
11-30-2009 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
11-30-2009 8:29 AM


How much genome DNA complexity does it take before we look for a non-materialistic explanation for life?
Only a small portion of a creature's DNA is protein-coding genes (around 1.5% in humans). In the 1970s, evolutionists began calling the rest of it "junk DNA", saying this collection of useless evolutionary debris showed there was no intelligent design involved. Decades later, researchers are finding that the "junk" does vital work. Some of this DNA plays a role in turning genes on and off at the right moments in a developing embryo22. Other bits separate coding and regulating sections, like punctuation marks in writing, so that DNA is not a long run-on sentence23. Other bits called Alu elements, found only in primates, can be spliced in or out during RNA processing to make different versions of the same gene.24 The "junk" label discouraged research into this part of the genome for many years; who would want to waste their time studying it?
Scientists have found that the number of genes a creature has is not a good measure of how complex it is. For example, the human genome is 23 times larger than the fruit fly genome (3.2 billion base pairs versus 137 million), yet humans have only about 2 times the number of protein coding genes (almost 25,000 versus 13,000 according to Human Genome Project Information). Yeast has about 6,000 genes

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 11-30-2009 8:29 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by cavediver, posted 11-30-2009 10:18 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 13 by Parasomnium, posted 11-30-2009 10:50 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 14 by Larni, posted 11-30-2009 1:20 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 160 (537714)
11-30-2009 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Parasomnium
11-30-2009 10:50 AM


Re: Heaps of simplicity
Parasomnium writes:
In fact, DNA is a prime example of finding materialistic explanations for previously baffling phenomena, where seemingly only non-materialistic explanations would suffice.
Hi Parasomnium.
Of course, that depends on one's perspective. From the ID perspective, that DNA complexity has previously baffled sciemce. requiring revised explanations supports the ID contention that complexity is a significant factor supportive of the ID POV.
That complexity continues to baffle science raises the question as to how much science really knows via exclusive materialistic explanations for what is observed.
Perhaps if science were to seriously research the possibility of a higher intelligence in the universe than what secularists consider to be observed on earth, science would discover that there are indeed non-materialistic explanations for some observable phenomena.
The Exodus Nuweiba Beach Aqaba crossing evidence comes to mind which secularist oceanic science researchers and archeologists show no interest in falsifying or verifying. Imo, if they really figured they could falsify the evidence they would be on top of it in a big way, but alas, there's no materialistic explanation for the phenomenon.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Parasomnium, posted 11-30-2009 10:50 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Larni, posted 11-30-2009 1:55 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 18 by lyx2no, posted 11-30-2009 3:55 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 19 by Parasomnium, posted 11-30-2009 3:55 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 20 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 11-30-2009 8:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 160 (537780)
11-30-2009 9:20 PM


Did any of the respondents to my last message happen to notice my example, as follows, relative to how secular scientists appear to have a paranoia towards non-materialistic research?
The Exodus Nuweiba Beach Aqaba crossing evidence comes to mind which secularist oceanic science researchers and archeologists show no interest in falsifying or verifying. Imo, if they really figured they could falsify the evidence they would be on top of it in a big way, but alas, there's no materialistic explanation for the phenomenon.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by subbie, posted 11-30-2009 10:20 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 26 by lyx2no, posted 11-30-2009 11:06 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 29 by Larni, posted 12-01-2009 4:11 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 160 (537789)
11-30-2009 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by subbie
11-30-2009 10:20 PM


subbie writes:
Pardon me for asking, but do you have any actual evidence that secular scientists are paranoid about this non-discovery, other than the fact that they're ignoring it?
Hi Subbie. I said that it appears that to be the case. Certainly something of this magnitude should arouse some serious research. No?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by subbie, posted 11-30-2009 10:20 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by subbie, posted 11-30-2009 10:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 28 by PaulK, posted 12-01-2009 2:05 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 160 (537792)
11-30-2009 10:31 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by lyx2no
11-30-2009 3:55 PM


Re: Fearing to Rely upon My Finite Wisdom
Say what, Lyx2no?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by lyx2no, posted 11-30-2009 3:55 PM lyx2no has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 160 (537843)
12-01-2009 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Larni
12-01-2009 4:11 AM


Re: Clarification
Larni writes:
Hi Buzz, please could you clarify your point on message 6?
Hi Larni. My point was that there comes a magnitude of complexity observed when non-materialistic factors should be considered.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Larni, posted 12-01-2009 4:11 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 7:57 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 42 by Larni, posted 12-01-2009 1:09 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 160 (537860)
12-01-2009 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by PaulK
12-01-2009 2:05 AM


Re: Exodus Non-materialist Evidence
PaulK writes:
The problem is that whatever the magnitude of the claims the magnitude of the evidence actually produced is close to zero.
Hi Paul. Not so. There's the Biblical record which states that Mt Sinai is in Arabia. This motivated Wyatt and others to research the region and likely path of the Exodus.
Without going into all of the pertinent details as to the change of route which Jehovah ordered, the do-able path to the region in question led to Nuweiba Beach which entrapped the Israelites on all sides by mountains.
The beach happened to be at the most shallow area of the entire sea, then known as the Red Sea including the Gulf of Aqaba.
The wheel and axle shaped formations happened to be the only such formations known in the Gulf region.
These formations were photographed on both sides of the shallow area, most being wheel shape. The researchers were marine scientists who had research craft and equipment to do professional work.
On the Arabian side other pertinent corroborating evidence was discovered, being a split rock as per scripture, having a dried up water flow protruding from it. Also a black topped mountain (not volcanic) having the appearance of being burnt as per scripture.
Other evidence such as inscriptions of bulls and columns which could have been related to the Exodus, etc were cited.
Bottom line: No, Paul; there's ample evidence to warrant research by such secularist entities such as the National Geographic Society, etc. Interestingly and apparantly, Nat'l Geographic amd their Robert Ballard, marine archeologist appear to have no interest in researching this significant discovery so as to either falsify or verify.
PaulK writes:
We have coral formations that look as if they might contain wheels. If they do contain wheels they are almsot certainly far too young and made of the wrong materials to have anything to do with the Exodus.
Paul, this is a baseless assertion which was never verified conclusively in the debates.
PaulK writes:
We have photographs of what is claimed to be a gold covered chariot wheel, showing no signs of coral growth at all. Or any other indication of age.
Again, a debatable factor, neither imperically verified or falsified as are your other points.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by PaulK, posted 12-01-2009 2:05 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by PaulK, posted 12-01-2009 1:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 160 (537864)
12-01-2009 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by AZPaul3
11-30-2009 11:37 PM


Re: Science Rules
AZPaul3 writes:
Haven't we been looking for non-material explanations for the last 30,000+ years? And with nothing much to show for the effort except some pretty pictures, stirring music and lots and lots of pain and blood, I might add.
Only in the last 300 years with the embrace of science has man progressed in every measurable way. Why, in god's name, would we ever want to go back to something that has been such a colossal failure for so long?
Hi PaulAZ. That all cultures of mankind's known history have embraced the non-materialistic lends evidence to non-materialistic origin.
That the most blessed, civilized, free, industrious and prosperous of those cultures have been Biblical based and the most non-civilized, non-free and non-prosperous have been either other religions or secularist (i.e. communist) lends credence to the non-materialistic explanation.
Religion had its shot at ruling man's mind. It failed. It's science's turn.
It did not fail in North America during it's first 200 years, but declines as NT Biblical principles decline.
LOL! Secularism had it's big ruthless, bloody and non-productive shot last century when under secularist totalitarian regimes over 100 million of citizens in Europe and Asia were murdered by their own secularist, materialistic and anti-non-materialistic governments.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by AZPaul3, posted 11-30-2009 11:37 PM AZPaul3 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:21 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 12-01-2009 10:31 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 160 (537866)
12-01-2009 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Straggler
12-01-2009 7:57 AM


Re: Clarification
Straggler writes:
What level of complexity?
Hi Straggler.
To answer your question, the ever growing level of complexity being discovered and observed. Who's to know how much more there is to be learnt?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 7:57 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:32 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 160 (537870)
12-01-2009 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Straggler
12-01-2009 10:21 AM


Re: Belief
Straggler writes:
Why do you consider belief in the supernatural to be evidence in favour of the actual existence of the supernatural?
I have never cited belief as evidence to anything, Straggler. Belief in anything should be based upon evidence.
As I have stated in one thread, my conversion when I received Jesus as savior at age 10 came about in an evangelistic service when the evangelist spoke on fulfilled Biblical prophecy. Over the centuries I have observed other fulfillments, personal experiences and archeological discoveries, etc. which have bolstered my belief in the Biblical record, i.e. the non-materialistic explanation for life and all that is observed.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:21 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:51 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 160 (537871)
12-01-2009 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Straggler
12-01-2009 10:32 AM


Re: Impetuousness
Straggler writes:
You haven't answered this. In fact you haven't even tried. So I'll ask again with some clarification.
Straggler, be advised that I'm not joined at the hip to my computer.
As you were demeaning, I was composing. I'm a slow thinking old guy. It takes a lot of time to think up and research stuff so as to not make myself look even more stupid than you all think. Lay off the carbohydrates, my friend. They appear to be making you hyper and impetuous.
God willing, I will get back to you and others. In the mean time I have a business and other things to attend to.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:32 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 11:01 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 160 (537898)
12-01-2009 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Straggler
12-01-2009 10:51 AM


Re: Belief
Straggler writes:
Oh. Then what did you mean by the following?
Buz writes:
That all cultures of mankind's known history have embraced the non-materialistic lends evidence to non-materialistic origin.
This sure sounds like citing belief in the supernatural as evidence of the supernatural.
Straggler, all of the non-materialistic evidence to which I have alluded is just that, evidence which is effected by the non-materialistic, which folks refer to as supernatural.
Like the DNA, the Exodus evidence cited is material but as per the topic title, some IDists regard it as having a non-materialistic explanation. Savvy, bud?
Realistically, however, what is regarded as supernatural is actually a higher dimension of the existing material which is invisible to mankind, but which, according to the Biblical record and even some accults, etc, has the capability to make itself visible to mankind. I believe one terminology for this would be supranatural.
Perhaps (I say 'perhaps') particles within the cosmos which have the appearance of moving in and out of existence border on the supranatural. If so, perhaps also this may be considered as science being obliged to begin dipping the toe into the uncharted waters of the supranatural. After all, isn't some mysterious aspects of QM and string theory non-materialistic in nature, inspiring some groups to believe this and others to believe that, relative to a given group's consensus, i.e. belief?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 10:51 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 12-01-2009 5:05 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 46 by Straggler, posted 12-01-2009 6:02 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 160 (537919)
12-01-2009 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Teapots&unicorns
12-01-2009 5:05 PM


Re: Belief
Teapots&unicorns writes:
It is 'belief' in the same way that you 'believe' in gravity. you cannot 100% know anything for sure.
Hi Teapot&u. Yes, I understand. It's like I cannot know 100% all about the wheel & axle shaped coral crusted stuff discovered in the region by the real post Exodus Mt Sinai where scripture has it and the other corroborating stuff cited in scripture, but like gravity, my belief is not baseless blind assertions.
When speaking of a theory, we usually put 'believe' at the front like "believe in plate tectonics" or "believe in evolution." It's mainly just a way of saying that you support one explanation over another- the facts are there, but the reasons are debatable. (Of course, the better the theory, the more specific the points)
Again, that's pretty much how I go at believing non-materialistic effected events and phenomena.
As per your reference of QM and string theory, no, they are not belief in the sense of 'faith.' Most of the things predicted by QM have been observed,.......
Check; Biblically predicted; subsequently observed; yup, me too.
.....of course there is going to be a some confusion;.......
Yes, like Richard Feynman, renouned physics guru admitted there were some mysterious aspects of QM which even he didn't fully understand. I cited the quote somewhere in the archives years ago.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 12-01-2009 5:05 PM Teapots&unicorns has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 160 (537925)
12-01-2009 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by lyx2no
11-30-2009 11:06 PM


Re: Did You
lyx2no writes:
Of course. I even did one better. I took a look at what half a doezen sites had to say about the crossing. All but one semed to have really close ties with fundamentalist causes and were about as critical as one would expect a mother to be of refrigerator art. One, truthorfiction, was less kind. They didn't seem impressed. Me either. If I were a researcher I wouldn't want to waste what little time and money I had on disproving something that hasn't actually been established. Don't you think it's kind of odd that your boys don't get on to establishing it.
Hi Lyx2no. Thanks for being patient.
1. The boys who have researched are limited due to funding and due to restrictions from the Saudis who have a vested interest in debunking the Biblical record in favor of their Koran. Your boys who have the scientific clout and funding should make a concerted effort to research the region. But alas, for the most part they, like most of you here at EvC, have already written off the Biblical record as fable and fiction. Thus you wave off anything and everything to do with it.
2. The reason secularists have this paranoia relative to each and every non-materialistic thing is that for any of you who are doggedly secular, one little non-materialistic miracle would be all it would take to topple your secularistic castle wherein you assume ammunity from accountability to any higher power.
What happened to one chariot wheel? I don't know, but that doesn't X out all of the more sophisticated scientific research done after Wyatt's death in the region by Lennart Moller and others who regarded the evidence enough to expend their time and $$ into the project.
You're exacting upon this what you are not willing to exact on mainline science. Neither is flawless and neither is totally objective. Both have differences of opinion amongst their ranks.
Thanks for responding. I (almost) always appreciate your witty and sensible input, young man, whether or not we see things from the same perspective.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by lyx2no, posted 11-30-2009 11:06 PM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by lyx2no, posted 12-01-2009 10:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 160 (537928)
12-01-2009 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Huntard
12-01-2009 10:31 AM


Re: This again?
Huntard writes:
Buzsaw writes:
That the most blessed, civilized, free, industrious and prosperous of those cultures have been Biblical based...
Like those of the middle ages... Oh snap!
Hi Huntard. Thanks for your patience.
LOL! Those middle age atrocities perpetrated by the ruthless popes and bishops of Vaticanism were totally contrary to the NT Biblical scriptures of Jesus and his apostles who advocated non-violence, even to the point of loving one's enemies.
Huntard writes:
Buz: ..and the most non-civilized, non-free and non-prosperous have been either other religions or secularist.
Huntard: Like the modern western world... Oh snap!
What other religions than Biblical and what secularist cultures enjoy more freedom, prosperity and civility than what the modern western world still affords? Granted, now that the Biblical principles are being undermined the western world is loosing all of that.
Folks here in the west are certainly not flocking to relocate in Muslim or secularistic communist regimes, for example.
Huntard writes:
You don't even know your own country's history? America was never based on any biblical values.
Who doesn't know what, Huntard?? You are not aware that our founders required the Bible and Watt's hymnal in all public schools, that Thomas Jefferson had church services held in the halls of congress, dispatching the Marine band for the music? You are unaware of all of the inscriptions on the buildings and walls of Washington DC? You are unaware that George Washington allocated funds to evangelize the Indians in Biblical doctrines? On and on I could go.
All western governments currently in power are secularist.
Agreed, and alas, the more secularist they/we get the more they/we decline. The half has not been told as we descend to a very hard upandcoming landing!

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 12-01-2009 10:31 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Huntard, posted 12-02-2009 1:35 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024