The accelerating expanding universe

Show us the math. Nothing else is going to be the least bit convincing.

duplicate removedEdited by NoNukes, : removed

They believe others who can check the math? They are convinced by descriptions of observations that confirm the theory?At present you have zero credibility. From you, rigorous proof is required

It does not depend much on trust anymore. Countless physics students have learned to follow the math. There are plenty of tutorials on the subject that allow even more people to grasp the basics. Some people do simply accept things without being able to check they math, but even those people can look for indicators that reliably point to quackery.For example, I know where real science turns up first, and it is not in vanity published books or on web pages. In my experience, science promoted in that way is invariably ignorable.Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Sorry, but that's the way it is.

It would be a little easier to read your posts if you separated your paragraphs with a blank line. Just hit 'return' or whatever key you use to generate a line feed twice rather than just once.Or don't. Your choice. The only good prediction is a tested prediction. A theory's fit with your own philosophy isn't much of a recommendation to others.You need not be impressed or convinced. But surely you can see why you are finding lots of doubters.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

This is wrong. The universe is clearly not homogeneous on a solar system, galaxy, or galactic cluster sized scale. Observationally, the effects of dark matter show up on a galactic scale scale but not on a solar system scale. This observation is not inconsistent with the scale on which the universe is thought to be homogeneous, i.e., somewhere beyond super cluster size.