I'm a skeptic on this one. I've contended with ICR and John Morris who thinks it's up on Mt Ararat. His dad made several expeditions up the mountain. It would be impossible for cows, horses and other animals to leave the ark on rough terrain.
The Biblical record says, "mountains of Ararat which implies the foothills. Ron Wyatt's discovery appears to make more sense since there's the large ballast stones nearby and the terrain is such that departure would be no problem. According to Wyatt, one of the ballast stones has ancient inscription of 8 people and a boat which perhaps some later people likely inscribed.
I've seen both Wyatt's stuff and David Fassold's video. David seems to be quite sensible and his video appears to be objective. David was with Ron on some of his latest expeditions. I met Ron Wyatt at a College where he showed us his slides of his 17 expeditions in the region back before he died. I have his book and have seen some video.
I don't necessarily buy all of Wyatt's claims. I believe the formation is simply an impression in the hillside which the ark left in the terrain. I'm thinking that the reason little if any evidence of iron is with the ark or much else is that after landing, most of the ark, including the iron parts were dismantled to use for building structures to live in, etc since they would have landed with need for supplies.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
