Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
45 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 44 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 886,007 Year: 3,653/14,102 Month: 273/321 Week: 89/44 Day: 5/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   August, 2010, Posts of the Month
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3840
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001


Message 2 of 15 (574812)
08-17-2010 10:57 PM


Jar, at "Conservative = Christian?"
Author: Jar
Forum: Coffee House
Thread: Conservative = Christian
Message #: 19

Jar writes:

Today terms like socialist or conservative or liberal or Christian have nothing to do what the terms meant in the past. They have become little more than Buz words, meaningless crap used for driving the emotions of the non-thinking citizenry.

I just don't know what further comment I could make.

Moose


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by anglagard, posted 08-17-2010 11:10 PM Minnemooseus has acknowledged this reply

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3840
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001


Message 4 of 15 (575439)
08-20-2010 2:37 AM


PaulK, at "Is Theistic Evolutionist An Oxymoron?"
Author: PaulK
Forum: Miscellaneous Topics in Creation/Evolution
Thread: Is Theistic Evolutionist An Oxymoron?
Message #: 8

A solid covering of what theistic evolution is.

Moose


Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3840
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001


Message 8 of 15 (576271)
08-23-2010 2:34 PM


Jar, at "Creation as Science"
Author: Jar
Forum: Is It Science?
Thread: Creation as Science
Message #: 66

A reply to Archaeologist that stands out in two ways:

1 - It contains relevant quality information presented in a clear and concise fashion (of course, he's mostly quoting one of his earlier messages - Maybe that message got (or should have gotten) a POTM nomination).

2 - It is not like the too many replies to Archaeologist (in that topic and elsewhere) that do not have the qualities stated in (1).

Or something like that.

Bluescat48 also replied to the same message with a brief comment - OK I guess, but definitely not a POTM.

Hotjer also did a longer and rather convoluted reply which may or may not make important points (it's probably way better than any reply I could do, but that's not saying much).

Dr Adequate made a reply to a later Archaeologist message that came close to getting him another suspension.

Minnemooseus (with additional Adminnemooseus comment)

Do NOT reply to the Adminnemooseus content (pretty much everything after point 1), in this topic.


Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021