Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9094 total)
8 online now:
dwise1, Kleinman, nwr, PaulK, Phat, Pollux, Theodoric (7 members, 1 visitor)
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Upcoming Birthdays: Raphael
Post Volume: Total: 901,249 Year: 12,361/6,534 Month: 1,854/1,988 Week: 435/640 Day: 35/110 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   August, 2010, Posts of the Month
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3893
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 4.0


Message 2 of 15 (574812)
08-17-2010 10:57 PM


Jar, at "Conservative = Christian?"
Author: Jar
Forum: Coffee House
Thread: Conservative = Christian
Message #: 19
Jar writes:
Today terms like socialist or conservative or liberal or Christian have nothing to do what the terms meant in the past. They have become little more than Buz words, meaningless crap used for driving the emotions of the non-thinking citizenry.
I just don't know what further comment I could make.
Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by anglagard, posted 08-17-2010 11:10 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3893
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 4.0


Message 4 of 15 (575439)
08-20-2010 2:37 AM


PaulK, at "Is Theistic Evolutionist An Oxymoron?"
Author: PaulK
Forum: Miscellaneous Topics in Creation/Evolution
Thread: Is Theistic Evolutionist An Oxymoron?
Message #: 8
A solid covering of what theistic evolution is.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3893
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 4.0


Message 8 of 15 (576271)
08-23-2010 2:34 PM


Jar, at "Creation as Science"
Author: Jar
Forum: Is It Science?
Thread: Creation as Science
Message #: 66
A reply to Archaeologist that stands out in two ways:
1 - It contains relevant quality information presented in a clear and concise fashion (of course, he's mostly quoting one of his earlier messages - Maybe that message got (or should have gotten) a POTM nomination).
2 - It is not like the too many replies to Archaeologist (in that topic and elsewhere) that do not have the qualities stated in (1).
Or something like that.
Bluescat48 also replied to the same message with a brief comment - OK I guess, but definitely not a POTM.
Hotjer also did a longer and rather convoluted reply which may or may not make important points (it's probably way better than any reply I could do, but that's not saying much).
Dr Adequate made a reply to a later Archaeologist message that came close to getting him another suspension.
Minnemooseus (with additional Adminnemooseus comment)
Do NOT reply to the Adminnemooseus content (pretty much everything after point 1), in this topic.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022