|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Born Again | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18349 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Initially, way back in message 24 I asked jar what part that God,Jesus, and/or the Holy Spirit played in my decision to do more for the least of these (whom I felt no real desire to help.)
My problem, as I saw it, was that I didnt feel born again or even very Christian. I felt that my own problems at earning enough money to retire on were as pressing as any charge that I had to help the homeless. Because of the internal conflict as to how I felt, I expressed myself in this forum topic. And so we continue.
jar writes: I had a dream a couple of nights ago, shortly after posting here and reading the early replies. Additionally, I have been stirred up by reading Francis Chans book, Crazy Love. (Yes, jar, I see that he is selling stuff) I imagine that Francis Chan is marketing a product. So be it. It made me feel guilty. Chan had some radical statements within his book. God did give you the power, and the great gift outlined in Genesis 2&3 where we gained the capability to know good from evil. Inspiration is irrelevant. Milton Frieman, on the other hand, had a sound argument that made myself and a hundred million other guilty capitalists feel a lot better about our basic path in life. The question arises, however. Is spirituality and daily economic and social reality compatable?
Ringo writes: I agree. My sin is a sin of indifference. Chan seems to emphasize that one cannot be a lukewarm christian. Jars "charge" even seems to corroborate what Chan is saying, without even having to bring religious indoctrination into it.
You're supposed to be less selfish and more loving.(...)That's why regeneration has to be perpetual. You fail one day but you succeed the next. MTW writes: See Mike, I dont see concise evidence that there are two distinct sets of people...namely "Lost" and "Found". If I ask a lost person for advice - he will give me an answer according to the flesh. If I ask a spiritual person, born again, and having walked with God in experience and maturity for many years, He will teach me in the way everlasting. I say a harsh thing to you phat - I ask a challenging question; when are you going to forget what others think - and ask the one Who can give you more than you could ever ask? I used to believe that this was so, but I have received very good advice from what some would consider "lost" people. This also gets us back to the source versus content discussion.
MTW writes: Mike, thank you very much for your concern. I do not believe that I am unable to hear Gods direction for my life. I do seem a bit anxious that He wont give me the inspiration or love for others that I seek. I do believe quite strongly that flesh and spirit are at odds with one another. Having an emotional catharsis from God is diametrically opposed to getting laid, for example. I can get ecstatic over a casino win and thank my lucky stars (or Jesus) for the moment, but we really cant expect God to reward a self proclaimed spiritual man with a carnal desire and attempt to "spiritualize" the episode, can we? Lets assume that the hundred million dollar powerball jackpot was a "spiritual gift" just waiting to be delivered to the right person. (keeping in mind that the love of money is the root of all evil! ) If a so-called righteous man prays for such a gift and has all of the right spiritual intentions as to the use for the money, is he any more likely to receive the gift than a crack addict, a New York Bank executive who is already loaded, or a politician in need of funding? Phat - I say this in a way of encouragement, but men can't solve your problems. Let's face it, listening to the philosophies of the naturalists makes you look even more at sea than ever before. That is because spiritually, you are still on milk. You can't ask a fleshly mind for a spiritual answer. Sorry I got off on that track....
MTW writes: Actually, I have, Mike. He wont give me any answers. He is not angry at me for discussing this with mere humans, however. Percys Forum wont get smited anytime soon.
No offense, but you will go in circles forever unless you get on your knees and pray out to God. Hyroglyphx writes: I think that honest introspection is a good thing. What would I be letting go of? For me, as a believer, God exists, has never forced me to do anything, and can no more be let go of than letting go of oxygen. (unless one were suicidal, which I'm not.) I believe that God does not expect all true inspiration and rationale to be found exists only in the Holy Bible, however. And that itself sparks a controversial argument!
think after some honest introspection, you'll realize how miserable following God's unrealistic goals are making you. I don't mean this to condescend you, I'm just expressing that I've been here before with that constant agony and intangible pang in the heart for not being able to measure up. My earnest suggestion is to stop torturing yourself and let go. MTW writes: I could accept the mercy. The guilt would go away. For some reason, however, the guilt is supposed to be there. I wont duck away from it so easily.
My walk with God, so many times I wanted or expected God would judge me or get angry, and infact He responded with mercy. jar writes: My main problem with this "charge" is that I am unsure what the exact instructions are. Milton Friedman does have some good points, after all. I received a clear epiphany from my dream the other day, however. My inability to care about others stems from my willful ignorance of myself. It could be one of the roots of my occasional depression.
I also think the idea of "Let go" is just a cop out, a way to get out of doing what we are charged to do. MTW writes: I am not really worried about getting into Heaven. I just know I may be embarrassed or even ashamed once I get there. I may have been focusing on the wrong thing.
Phat says he doesn't "feel" urges to be generous. Well, being generous won't get him into heaven. Christ, our righteousness, is the one who saves us, and he IS generosity. For God IS LOVE. jar writes: I can agree with this. I sometimes feel, however, that what God tells me is even twisted by myself to conform to whats comfortable for me. Hopefully, this guilt will allow me to progress eventually rather than going in circles.
If you ask God, the only thing you should ask is "What should I do?" MikeTheWiz writes: I agree totally, Mike. I need to read my Bible more. I am not afraid of being brainwashed by any man or philosophy. God has given me a sound mind. It is my heart that I am more worried about, though!
my advice to Phat is to only do as the New Testament says - all of it, not just parts, and to study it. That is good advice, not snake oil...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member
|
As for my attitude, I am sure you think you do phat a service, but infact, I know from experience, as a fellow-Christian, what he is going through, as for many years I battled the legalism of havin to earn God's favour. No you didn't, Mike. You used to be a whole lot more laid back, objective, submissive and humble in the past. You seem more legalistic to me now that you ever were in the past.
I give spiritual advice - you swear at me and get angry because you think I am trying to earn religious points. I swear at you? Why? Because I used the word "shit?" It just a word, Mike. Please show me where in the bible that the word "shit" is a "bad word." These are concoctions of a timid and frightened society. It has nothing to do with God. God is simply evoked to give it some kind of authority.
I am not doing anything other than helping phat to see this from a biblical perspective, and yet as usual, because I am an uncompromising Christian, people jump to all manner of conclusions about me, with ad hominem comments, or atleast allusions, such as "browny points". Just making an observation. You have to be out there actively trying to save people's souls. In fact, that was Jesus' very last commission to his flock. Therefore you have a vested interest in converting people. True or not true? "Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tram law Member (Idle past 4734 days) Posts: 283 From: Weed, California, USA Joined: |
It means that your parents went to a cult meeting, and now when you die your mother gives birth to you again and you grow really fast to your true physically age.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18349 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
quote: And what if one has problems wanting to repent? Do we simply wait until the attitude changes? Look, I have no problem giving to worthy causes. Heck, I'll even do it without the tax break...and cheerfully too! I refuse, however, to help an alcoholic get a beer. Or a homeless man who has been caught stealing in my store. Maybe this is why I am so miserable at times, I dunno...seems as if I am getting taxed more, am becoming poorer myself, and yet am expected to help a class of people who already get free food from Uncle Sam. Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18349 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Double Post
Edited by AdminPD, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
I refuse, however, to help an alcoholic get a beer. Or a homeless man who has been caught stealing in my store. You cannot help addicts by financing their habits. No one expects that of you. But generally speaking, you are stuck in a rut until your attitude regarding repentance changes, and left alone that might never happen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
void
Edited by NoNukes, : stupid duplicate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
And what if one has problems wanting to repent? I don't think you'll find the answer to that question on the Internet.
I refuse, however, to help an alcoholic get a beer. Why?
Or a homeless man who has been caught stealing in my store. Why? Love your enemies!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18349 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
My father was a homebuilder who worked hard his whole life and who was my role model. He once told me never to give a homeless man money because they may buy beer or liquor with it. Instead, Dad would offer to buy them a meal. Some took him up on it, others didn't.
Dad taught me practical generosity. Why contribute to a mans alcohol or drug addiction?
Matthew7:6 writes: This goes for foreign nations as well. If the US simply helps a new dictator come to power in order to oust an old one, are we not casting pearls before swine? Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces. Money doesn't come easy, and it should never go easy either. Think before you give. Edited by Phat, : fixed quote
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
Instead, Dad would offer to buy them a meal. When was the last time you did this?
If the US simply helps a new dictator come to power in order to oust an old one, are we not casting pearls before swine? Nowhere does Jesus tell folk to overthrow dictators to put new ones in power.
Think before you give. Was that the charge given? Jon Love your enemies!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
Think of it as contributing to his self-esteem, allowing him the dignity of deciding for himself how to spend the money. Why contribute to a mans alcohol or drug addiction? Ultimately, he's the one who has to decide whether to use drugs or not. By withholding money, all you're doing is motivating him to use more desperate means - e.g. crime - to get them. When you give him money, you're also giving him responsibility. If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Phat writes: Dad taught me practical generosity. Why contribute to a mans alcohol or drug addiction? Is that practical? If you buy a man food, you are enabling him to spend whatever other money he can panhandle on his true passion. I'll admit that I'm a lighter touch when someone asks me for food rather than money, but I also know that most of the homeless people I encounter have drug and/or alcohol problems. Your dad was a generous man, but in a practical sense, giving away food rather than cash is just a little easier on the conscience.
Money doesn't come easy, and it should never go easy either. That's your own personal philosophy, and not one I agree with. Yes, you should think before you give, but that shouldn't impede sharing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1971 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
It is to receive another life in addition to the life that you received when you were naturally born.
From the receiver's initial standpoint it is like coming to know a Person.
Regeneration is a rebirth which brings in a new life. It is absolutely a matter of life, not a matter of doing. Regeneration is simply to have life other than the life we already have. We have already received the human life from our parents; now we need to receive the divine life from God. Hence, regeneration means to have the divine life of God in addition to the human life which we already possess. Therefore, regeneration requires another birth in order to possess another life. To be regenerated, to be born again, does not mean to adjust or correct ourselves. It means to have the life of God, just as to be born of our parents means to have the life of our parents. To be regenerated is to be born of God (John 1:13), and to be born of God is to have the life of God, that is, the eternal life (3:15-16). (Witness Lee, LS of John, 98) quoted from below: Witness Lee & Watchman Nee teach regeneration Edited by jaywill, : No reason given. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Why did Jesus ask Nicodemus, "Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?" (John 3:10) if He wasn't talking about the Jewish idea of rebirth/renewal/regeneration?
If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1971 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
Why did Jesus ask Nicodemus, "Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?" (John 3:10) if He wasn't talking about the Jewish idea of rebirth/renewal/regeneration? I don't know for certain. My opinion is that Jesus was saying that the real teachers of Israel spoke according to God's divine revelation.
"Jesus answered and said to him, You are a teacher of Israel, and you do not know these things. Truly, truly, I say to you, We speak that which we know and testify of that which we have seen, and yet you do not receive our testimomy." (v.10,11) This strikes me as Jesus saying the He and John the Baptist and the prophets are the genuine teachers of Israel. They are speak according to the revelation of God. The genuine teacher of Israel has something learned not by rot, but by direct revelation from God. Jesus was gently chiding his superficial religious position and exposing his need to receive revelation from God in order to be among the true teachers of Israel. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024