The actual case in point though is one where the big issue is unrelated to the peer review process.
It looks like Trevio is more than likely referring to a paper that presents some methodology to replace FROG.
Okay.
That will get tested not in the world of reviews but in the labs. If the new process does turn out to be more efficient, cheaper, superior to FROG then it will likely prevail regardless of what is found in reviews and papers.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!