And chess champs make poor war generals. One must apply mind over matter here, not repeat everything they read as non-negotiable COMMANDMENTS.
I do archaeology for a living, with human skeletal analysis as one of my specialties.
Don't equate this as "repeating everything I read" as you would be entirely wrong. Again.
The issue of shorter life spans is also seen today - in countries where poor survival conditions are present.
This is what has been seen around the world for most of our 200,000 years as modern humans. No surprises there.
This has no bearing on the earliest periods where the earth was less impacted by such conditions as deseases, population and war displacements: the premise you apply is about history, not physics.
Sorry, no. That is not supported by the facts.
It is again transcended by the physics of the universe expansion and its impacts.This factor gives scientific plausibility humans would have had greater life spans in the first 500 years, in diminishing ratios as conditions became impacted by negative factors. It also says a 24 hour day was relatively recent in the big universal picture.If one accepts the expansion premise - they must accept its reverse as we go backwards. Science 101.
Nonsense 101. There is no scientific evidence for any of this.
Stick to making biblical claims, but don't try to drag science down with you.
Then you're only wrong in one field of study.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
