Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9078 total)
87 online now:
PaulK, Percy (Admin), Phat (3 members, 84 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,161 Year: 6,273/6,534 Month: 466/650 Week: 4/232 Day: 4/28 Hour: 2/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   is there any case for Intelligent design in man made products
Member (Idle past 1795 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007

Message 60 of 72 (663991)
05-28-2012 9:14 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Portillo
05-28-2012 4:38 AM

Portillo writes:

So if your going to explain an event in the past, you have to invoke a cause which is known to produce the effect in question.

That rule would be rather unfair to creationism, wouldn't it? Supernatural beings aren't known to cause any effects, are they? They aren't even known to exist.

"Code" is known to be a prerequisite for all observed intelligent designers, and therefore, at least partially, a proximate cause of the "effect" known as intelligence.

It's always worth remembering that when humans intelligently design things successfully, those things must fit and function in the physical world. This constraint also applies to nature's unintelligent designs. That's probably the main reason why there are often resemblances between the two.

Because we make fire, it does not follow that volcano gods are responsible for volcanic activity or that lightning gods are necessary. Because we make canals, it does not follow that all waterways that can function as transport routes were intelligently designed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Portillo, posted 05-28-2012 4:38 AM Portillo has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022