Dogma writes:
Believing that 2 and 2 are 4 is not really in the same category as believing that you can run a mile in 3:40.
Is believing that you can run a mile in 3:40 in the same category as believing that you can run a mile in under a second? What is it that qualifies something to be categorised in the way you are talking about here?
Dogma writes:
Well, nothing causes miracles Straggler but belief is certainly one of the factors involved when determining the possibility of a thing.
It is a factor in as to whether something will happen or not in the same way that desire or fear or arrogance or embarrassment or stupidity, or indeed any other human state of mind, is a factor. It is not a factor in the same way that the laws of physics are a factor as to whether something is inherently achievable or not. So - again - I think you are conflating different concepts of what it means for something to be "possible".
Dogma writes:
It is clear that the skeptic wants to dismiss belief as a force of nature. Why?
A "force of nature".....? It is this sort of language along with notions of "making the impossible possible" that suggests you are elevating belief into some form of mind-over-matter magical mysticism.
Dogma writes:
If it is a factor in the calculation then it can make that which is otherwise impossible possible.
My desire to avoid sitting in traffic combined with my belief that the bus will be stuck in traffic causes me to cycle to work. Without this belief I wouldn't have cycled to work today. Has my desire to avoid sitting on a bus in a traffic jam combined with this belief "made the impossible possible"...? Would you describe my belief in buses getting stuck in traffic as a "force of nature" that "shapes my reality"...?
My son believes in Santa Claus. This causes him to leave a mince pie and glass of wine for Santa and a carrot for the reindeers on Christmas eve. Has his belief "made the impossible possible"...? Would you describe his belief that Rudolf will enjoy the carrot he has left as a "force of nature" that "shapes his reality"...?
It all sounds so powerful when you start talking about "the power of belief" but the fact is all human activity (most of which is rather trivial) is based on what we believe to be true. Everything we consciously do is based on some sort of belief isn't it?
So what exactly is it you are highlighting as "special" here?
Dogma writes:
I guess my point is that it is far more impressive and potent than it is generally perceived to be.
I guess my point is that if you dress it up in certain language you can make any human activity sound like it is derived from "the power of belief". Because humans act on what they believe to be true all the time.
Dogma writes:
Look at the effect that the general belief that the terrorists were coming has had on the level of freedom in the world today.
I would say fear was the primary factor here.
Dogma writes:
Or what causes a run on the bank?
When people collectively act out of fear or desperation or anything else they are capable of both great and stupid things.
Dogma writes:
Why is the bias of any particular news service important?
Because it manipulates people's behaviour in a direction determined by someone else.
Dogma writes:
Are these trivial things?
Humans can achieve things which I think we would both agree are non-trivial. But are these things any more dictated by the human state of mind you are calling "belief" than many of the rather hum-drum things we all do on a daily basis?
If you are simply saying humans constantly act on their beliefs and humans are sometimes capable of non-trivial things - Then I guess I agree.
But I'm not sure this warrants the sort of mystical sounding hype you are giving it. You could just as easily talk about the power of sex or the power of greed or the power of love or the power of any other state of mind that drives people to do the things they do.