Increases in Genetic Information

Just being real writes:Many operate under the misguided notion that we can trust what the scientific community is telling us about human evolution. But how quickly they forget things like more than 500 doctoral dissertations that were written between 1908 to 1953, about the famous Eoanthropus fossil.

Just being real writes: No actually not. And I'm sure most have long since been quietly removed from circulation. But there is the life time works of Arthur Keith. Perhaps you've heard of one of his more famous books that centered on Piltdown Man. "The Antiquity of Man"

Just being real writes:I don't believe it is off topic since a primary question posed in the topic is evidence for "macro-evolution." To which coyote commented that the evidence for human evolution would be a primary example of that evidence. I was merely pointing out that this evidence (so called) is really more of a stumble in the dark at best and riddled with more questions than answers.

just being real writes:Moving on, I am sure you think that none exist, so let me ask you a question. Why does a site that is famous for knocking creationists and intelligent design proponents (Wikipedia) also even admit that there were at least 250?

Just being real writes:Lol! Okay, so I guess you guys really showed me huh? The fact that I said "doctoral dissertations" when I probably should have just said "PAPERS" totally destroys my whole point... how is that again exactly? Obviously as I already admitted, I don't know the thesis personally. And as I'm sure you already know, I followed someone else's error in poor choice of wording. But does this error in wording mean that no scientists were ever deceived by Piltdown man? And if that is true how exactly does that also undermine the fact that the public was deceived by Piltdown man along also with Pithecanthropus, Sinanthropus, Homo Habilis, Australopithecus, Ramapithecu, and Neanderthalensis?Cause I'm not seeing the relevance, with the exception of a sad attempt at making me look bad as opposed to having anything really substantial to speak to the point I was making.

Just being real writes:Cause I'm not seeing the relevance, with the exception of a sad attempt at making me look bad as opposed to having anything really substantial to speak to the point I was making.