Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 74 (9014 total)
45 online now:
ICANT, PaulK (2 members, 43 visitors)
Newest Member: Ashles
Upcoming Birthdays: Raphael
Post Volume: Total: 881,976 Year: 13,724/23,288 Month: 242/412 Week: 29/40 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the Latest On Dr Schweitzer Trex Soft Tissue Find?
ringo
Member
Posts: 18809
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 18 of 33 (733638)
07-19-2014 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mram10
07-19-2014 12:51 PM


mram10 writes:

Here is the link I was reading: link


quote:
Young-earth creationists also see Schweitzer’s work as revolutionary, but in an entirely different way. They first seized upon Schweitzer’s work after she wrote an article for the popular science magazine Earth in 1997 about possible red blood cells in her dinosaur specimens. Creation magazine claimed that Schweitzer’s research was “powerful testimony against the whole idea of dinosaurs living millions of years ago. It speaks volumes for the Bible’s account of a recent creation.”

This drives Schweitzer crazy. Geologists have established that the Hell Creek Formation, where B. rex was found, is 68 million years old, and so are the bones buried in it. She’s horrified that some Christians accuse her of hiding the true meaning of her data. “They treat you really bad,” she says. “They twist your words and they manipulate your data.”



That article is from May 2006.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mram10, posted 07-19-2014 12:51 PM mram10 has acknowledged this reply

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 18809
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 27 of 33 (734161)
07-26-2014 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by mram10
07-26-2014 11:15 AM


Re: Smiley faces
mram10 writes:

It's easy to jump on the secular science bandwagon. It is much harder to be a real scientist and question everything.


You keep talking about "real science" as if it was somehow different from "secular science". Maybe you could tell us what you think "real science" is, and why you think secular scientists aren't doing it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by mram10, posted 07-26-2014 11:15 AM mram10 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020