Rayne writes:
What I ment by "how many mutations are passed to the offspring" was, how many were able to be passed on, as in the parents didn't die before reproducing, or the offspring were not killed by the mutations before being able to reproduce (you could throw some sterility stuff in there too if you want).
The answer is in the numbers I gave previously, but I'll try to spell it out more clearly, with a few more numbers of interest.
What is passed on to you from your parents is a mix of their genomes. You get something like 3 billion base pairs from each parent, and this makes up your own diploid genome of something like 6 billion base pairs.
Something like 5% of the human genome is made up of genes coding for proteins. (Ref:
Human genome project) A smaller fraction will still have sequence significance; but not directly coding proteins; they may bind to other proteins and have a regulatory function, for example. But most of the genome is apparently "junk".
Something like 64 (Drake's figure; this may be a bit low) new mutations show up in the germ-line of each human generation. This means that your own genome is 50% from Mum, 50% from Dad, and 0.000001% due to new mutations arising between you and your parents. Of those new mutations, around about 3 will be in coding DNA (5% of 64). Since the genetic code is redundant, a change to a codon might not actually change the amino acid sequence in expressed proteins; although it will give scope for more change as mutations accumulate in your own descendents.
Perhaps as few as one or two mutations between you and your parents will actually make a difference in the proteins produced in your body. However, your children will add a few more, and so on, and over time your descendents will represent a range of diverse changes. This is the raw material of evolution.
All this is "random", which means it occurs without any particular correlation for your own needs. You might have more, or less than these numbers; and the effects of any changes to your proteins might be neutral, or less often detrimental, or less often still beneficial. Detriment or benefit is a measure of the overall consequence for your reproductive fitness in your present environment; and can result from whole cascades of subtle effects.
A lot of evolution is simply due to genetic drift, which refers to the accumulation of change that is neutral for fitness.
The whole issue is complicated by other kinds of mutation, in which whole subsequences of DNA are cut and pasted from one place to another, or chromosomal changes (as in mice on Madeira, discussed in another thread). These are rather less frequent. Most evolutionary change seems to be simple point substitutions, or small insertions or deletions; and so the number quoted previously of 1 to 6 non-silent changes in coding DNA gives you the ball park figure.
This is the background showing up in every new individual. It does not mean deformities, nor does it imply sterility. It is the normal background rate of mutation.
I have a feeling I will end up checking that site out soon. (Not tonight though, too late and I have school tommarow; and more homework to do.)
Sure, no worries. But as I tried to hint earlier, you won't simply be able to look up answers quickly. What you need to do is continue learning the basics, both at school and as you do extended study for your own interest from other sources. It is well worth the effort, and I'm impressed that you are proposing to tackle the subject in more detail. You will find it very rewarding. I often wish I had done more biology in my own studies.
Cheers -- Sylas