IamJoseph writes:
Do you refer to a design being manifest and evident, or a designer (by your term, 'designED')? Do you want to define what constitutes a design?
I am referring to a "design being manifest and evident". I believe you made the claim that the universe was designed. So, the definition of what constitutes a design is for you to provide and defend.
I regard gravity and the human body as awesome, complex designs, based on definitive and complex structures and engineerings. Further, I see all these structures as intergrated, which my small mind says, cannot in any wise be random occurences. And designED is best evidenced by an intergrated set of complex structures, while each of those structures may be unaware of each other.
By this statement you seem to be saying that definitive and complex structure in anything means it was designed. As was asked before, does this mean that snowflakes are designed?
Also, "complex structure" I understand but I am a little hazy on "definitive structure". What makes a structure definitive?
BTW, is this topic for providing the best evidence for 6-day creationism or for all brands of creationism?
™ Version 4.2