Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,900 Year: 4,157/9,624 Month: 1,028/974 Week: 355/286 Day: 11/65 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What isn't natural?
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 9 of 58 (398747)
05-02-2007 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
05-02-2007 6:16 AM


Larni writes:
Hoot Mon writes:
The human is like any other animal, we’re all hard-wired to fear death. Some animals take up arms races to counter what they fear, such as the porcupine.
I disagree. Living things are aversive to aversive stimulus. I don't think an ameoba fears death but it will move away from an acidic solution.
It really pains me to say this, but I'd have to agree with Hoot on this because he wasn't using the word "fear" literally. Survival, or maintaining one's continued existence, is hardwired into every living organism. Even the species that purposely take some actions to die to give their offsprings a chance at life, like some spiders that feed their young with their own bodily fluids, are doing it to maintain the continued existence of their genes.
Larni writes:
Hoot Mon writes:
Some animals take up arms races to counter what they fear, such as the porcupine.
Fear had nothing to do with it. You are assigning an affective drive to evolution.
Again, he was speaking figuratively here. The porcupine's ancestors didn't consciously say, "ok, let's evolve to develope bad-ass armor piercing spears to protect ourselves..." Nonetheless, they did develop a very effective mean to defend themselves, and Hoot Mon was only referring to it as an arms race as a figurative referrence to what human civilizations do.
Larni writes:
This pains me, it really pains me; but I have to go with Rob here with a caveat.
Humans are special but it is becuase of the complexity of our brains not special creation. It is possible that other non human animals may fear death but I would argue the level of abstraction we can.
Humans fear death on a level of cognitive recognition. So we can conlude that the god assumption is just another overvalued idea in the human mind and therfore quite natural.
Well, if you want to say that we are special because of our brain and our cognitive abilities, might as well say penguins are special because of their special adaptation to one of the harshest environments on earth. Penguins must be god's chosen "people" then.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 05-02-2007 6:16 AM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Fosdick, posted 05-02-2007 7:20 PM Taz has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 10 of 58 (398751)
05-02-2007 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Percy
05-02-2007 7:52 AM


I think the problem here, which I think is so bleedingly obvious that noone has actually thought much of it, is our unintentional use of the fallacy of division and fallacy of composition. For example, Hoot Mon seemed to have argued that everything is natural because pretty much everything is made of things that are found out there without any human meddling. Every part of my printer is "natural" because every atom in it is suppose to be naturally occuring atoms. However, I would argue that the printer itself is not natural because it's not like I can start digging and find a canon color printer.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 05-02-2007 7:52 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Percy, posted 05-02-2007 2:24 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 13 by Fosdick, posted 05-02-2007 7:35 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 58 (398844)
05-02-2007 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Fosdick
05-02-2007 7:35 PM


Re: Not natural?
Isn't this interesting? It is now boiling down to is life natural at all?
Honestly, this is giving me a headache, so I'm gonna just walk away with my hands covering my ears.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Fosdick, posted 05-02-2007 7:35 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 20 of 58 (418100)
08-26-2007 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Fosdick
08-25-2007 11:23 AM


Re: Nature is natural
Hoot, have you gone off the deep end?

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Fosdick, posted 08-25-2007 11:23 AM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Fosdick, posted 08-26-2007 11:36 AM Taz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024