Des,
You can claim 'evolution' is not science until you are blue in the face - but that doesn't make it so.
You say that you support 'real science' but somehow are against evolution which I would tender is real science.
Last time I checked you are not the arbiter of what is and what isn't science.
In fact what is and what isn't science in your view should be replaced with the phrase - what I agree with is science but what I don't agree with is not science. One could say that it not a 'scientific' approach.
Perhaps you could inform us of the wealth of scientific expertise that you posess that enable these sweeping statements of yours. Or is it, as I think more likely, more useless appeals from a personal incredulity.