Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bad science?
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6384 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 69 of 148 (322882)
06-18-2006 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Armbar
06-18-2006 3:15 AM


re: what makes a scientist?
Hello Armbar and welcome to EvC - I hope you enjoy your stay
Is seems to me that evolutionists think that fossils talk a very long time to form.(millions of years perhaps)
I'm afraid it seems to you wrong. There is a difference between (some) fossils being millions of years old and them taking that long to form.
If you dig around EvC I'm sure you'll find a discussion of how long fossilisation takes (I think it cropped up in passing in a thread within the last few months).

Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Armbar, posted 06-18-2006 3:15 AM Armbar has not replied

  
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6384 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 117 of 148 (340026)
08-14-2006 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Quetzal
08-13-2006 8:45 PM


Re: WHAT IS AND ISN'T SCIENCE?
Does that mean we should all sacrifice goats to propitiate thunderstorms?
I prefer the 'let's all go up to the field and have an orgy' type of religious service.
Both methods work equally well but the latter is far more satisfying

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Quetzal, posted 08-13-2006 8:45 PM Quetzal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024