Bad science?

Hello. 2nd day checking this place out and now my first post.
Hopefully the topic is Bad science.There seems to be hundreds of definitions of science. Is seems to me that evolutionists think that fossils talk a very long time to form.(millions of years perhaps)If part of science is observation and we observe in Japan and following the Mount St. Helens eruption the formation of fossils in a short period of time. Should that not be taken into consideration by evolutionists that fossils can be formed quickly. And is that not bad science if they refuse to change thier idea after observing something.

RiveratYour comment about contributing to science and needing to be educated is interesting if you come from a creation belief. How does one educate themself on the sphere of the earth when the school teaches that it is flat?Not that I believe anyone believes the earth is flat but just trying to make a point that so call enlightened ones of our society have closed their minds off to anything new. Or old in this case.There is a book called "None of these diseases." It is about a doctor who for 50 years is laughed at because he wants other doctors to apply biblical practises of hygiene to their work. Many of his ideas are still used today and he got them from the bible, not from the educated ones who laughed at him.