You were'nt in the seminar. I was and he used evolutionist theory extensively to make his points. As I said early in the thread, this man debates evolutionists. Do you think he would challenge debate having little knowledge of evo?
yes, yes i would. many people on this board challenge evolutionary theory without knowing a damn thing about it, ICR,DI and tons of YECS do this everyday
Incidentally, next time you hear a creationist propagandist qsI don't know the extent of his guppy research. I didn't ask the details. You claiming that he "used to be an evolutionist", ask him what the theory of evolution is. I always do, and they always turn out to be liars.
I agree with DA, not to pick on faith, but on many occations she said she was an evolutionist then changed to a YEC later in life, but she really doesn't seem to know much about evolution
I don't know the extent of his guppy research. I didn't ask the details. You may email him if you wish. My point for the purpose of this thead is that he is an IDist creo scientist doing science.
i'm confused, what does trying to refute specification have anything to do with ID or creationism?
this is part of the problem buz, the creationist "scientists" arn't really doing anything with creationism, what your example is doing is simply trying to test that part of the theory, though as far as i can tell not very well, but still what he is doing has nothing to do with eather ID or creationism
he could be an evolutionist and still do what he is doing.
what people are asking is, is there anyone doing anything to test the mechanics of ID or to test the mechanics of creationism, like the flood or showing intelligent design.
this would be science, the testing of the hypthosis or theory you are trying to show as an explanation through evidence
showing part of evolution is faulty is needed, but as i and a lot of people have said, showing a part of one theory is wrong doesn't make another right
he isn't doing IDist or creation science he's just trying to refute something in evolution, its not the same tihng
™ Version 4.2