I think it is clearly you who is being anti-science here. You are needlessly injecting politics into the science of history. I have the ideal that science should be free from politics, while you just blandly assume that Darwinist science is free from politics. It's not, as you can see when reading Dawkins, or Lorenz, or Haeckel or Darwin.
You can't just shake your head and say 'No I'm not, you are' without giving a reason. It also seesm to be common knowledge on this board that you haven't read anything by those authors. I can assure you that what I've read of Darwin and Dawkins (The Blind Watchmaker, and The Origin of Species) contain nothing even remotely political in the slightest. I'm sure if you've only ever read a few out-of-context, edited quotes it could be made to look like they do, however.
Natural Selection should be formulated individually, in stead of comparitively, if we would apply the same rules which we apply in every other science.
Please stop talking in riddles and elaborate on this further, if it actually makes any sense whatsoever.