Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9054 total)
367 online now:
jar, nwr, PaulK (3 members, 364 visitors)
Newest Member: EWolf
Post Volume: Total: 888,271 Year: 5,917/14,102 Month: 65/438 Week: 109/83 Day: 11/21 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   dinosaur and human co-existence
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


(1)
Message 77 of 271 (559503)
05-10-2010 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Buzsaw
05-09-2010 9:13 PM


Re: Reptiles and Dinosaurs
Hi Buzsaw

It seems clear to me, indeed, that the word serpent is a mistranslation of surfpet, or surf pet. That implicates seals and sea lions. Before the fall Adam and Eve would frolic for hours with their favorite pinnipeds.

Phocidae of that time, walked on their hind legs and wore hats of various colors. That they do not do so today is evidence of their disgrace in the eyes of God who removed their ears to make the balancing of hats difficult to maintain while belly walking. This must be true, Buz, because on one at the Woods Hole Oceanic Research Institute has to date written a single word in any peer review journal refuting this powerful evidence.

Odobenidae complimented their stylish mustaches with tobacco pipes and canes. Being forced to live in the water has made the use of either ridiculous. Yet, to this day walrus still sport the mustache in defiance of the Lord Jesus Christ currently of Belchertown, Massachusetts.

Otariidae are also called "walking seals" implicating seals that walk; whereas, Penni is latin for "wing" indicating that they were at one time Winged Angels of the Eucharist that tried to get the Apostles to accept cannibalism with the eating of the Lord Jesus Christ currently of Belchertown, Massachusetts. It is well know that serial cannibal Jeffery Dohmer started out as a child plying his teacher with apples, before moving on to eating road kill in Northampton, Massachusetts.

Furthermore, it is the premise, perse, of my thesis that if I can type it it is true. I evidentually support this objectively by the deafening silence coming from the Woods Hole goon squads.

Additionally also, where you say "The evidence must be of the serpent kind.", it is made plain that you do not understand the evolutionallary pathway of the the snake from the brontosaurus. A genetic mutation caused a caudal structure to extend from the right side of its thorax, while a wholly unrelated mutation caused a caputal structure to extend from the left side of its thorax, while yet a third wholly unrelated mutation caused a general atropy of the brontosaurs out of the middle. This makes wholly untenable your entire thesis of Buzsaw Conjecture.

And finally, you have to stop using the word "must" when expounding your hypothalizations. As soon as you introduce magic; all bets are off.


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Buzsaw, posted 05-09-2010 9:13 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


Message 160 of 271 (560268)
05-14-2010 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 157 by Buzsaw
05-13-2010 11:00 PM


Re: Reptiles and Dinosaurs
I just learned
looks like
if you rap bendable* wire around it.
What are the implications of this little beknownst truth? That they look alike has to mean something important, right? And what are the implications of a Toosie Roll® looking like a pekingese turd?

Buz, you are setting a new low for yourself in the evidence department.

* Not the unbended curved kind.


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Buzsaw, posted 05-13-2010 11:00 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


(1)
Message 182 of 271 (560507)
05-15-2010 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by Buzsaw
05-15-2010 3:37 PM


Re: Meteor Selective Wipeout
So, is Keller arguing that the impact occurred 304,350 years ago? Because if she isn't her argument doesn't help you much.


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Buzsaw, posted 05-15-2010 3:37 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by Buzsaw, posted 05-15-2010 9:15 PM lyx2no has responded

  
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


(1)
Message 192 of 271 (560545)
05-15-2010 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by Buzsaw
05-15-2010 9:15 PM


Get Up to Speed
Perhaps you should either explain yourself or click back to the message and read what she said, Lyx2no.

I choose explain.

You have the dinos killed off in a great flood 4,350 years ago. As you are citing Keller, who puts the strike at 300,000 years prior to the extinction — your great flood — as evidence for your position, you are, therein, putting the strike at 304,350 years ago.

All well and good. But if you don't believe that Keller is arguing for a strike at 304,350 years ago you shouldn't be citing her as support for your position. You can't go round citing the bits you like. It's called quote mining. Are you familiar with the term?


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Buzsaw, posted 05-15-2010 9:15 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Coyote, posted 05-15-2010 10:59 PM lyx2no has acknowledged this reply
 Message 194 by Buzsaw, posted 05-15-2010 11:58 PM lyx2no has responded

  
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


(1)
Message 200 of 271 (560569)
05-16-2010 2:33 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by Buzsaw
05-15-2010 11:58 PM


I'm Nice to Five Year Olds
Hey, kiddo, I wasn't born 5 years ago, so stop treating me as if I was.

Don't make me explain the obvious, Pops.

Nice try at obfuscating my position, applying my flood catastrophic non-uniform position to ToE dating methodology, which assumes relative uniformity.

Nice try at obfuscating the English language. I can only guess what this is supposed to mean. I ran it through a Yoda speak converter and it neither helped nor harmed:

Buzsaw cum Yoda writes:

My position nice try at obfuscating, to ToE dating methodology applying my flood catastrophic non-uniform position, which assumes relative uniformity. Yes, hmmm.

Buzsaw thinks he writes:

Nice try at obfuscating my position: applying ToE dating methodology to my flood catastrophic non-uniform position.

I did nothing of the sort, Buz. You, however, failed to apply your own reference to your own argument. Where is it my fault that you can't associate two thoughts if they're separated by a period?

Buzsaw thinks he writes:

ToE dating methodology assumes relative uniformity.

No, buz, uniformity is observed. We observe an armored car pulling up in front of a bank. We observe an empty handed, uniformed guard getting out of the armored car and walk into the bank. We observe the gaurd walk out of the bank with bags marked $ and get into the armored car. We observe the armored car drive away. We have observed a bank pick-up.

If you want to claim that a pick-up is assumed; it could have been a robbery or a practice run, then it is you who are assuming. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that either of the assumptions is out of the question. Both are completely valid. But what isn't valid is to make either of those assumptions without cause. Bank pick-ups are very common, even
daily, events. The alternatives rare.

Our observations of uniformity are compilations of thousands upon millions of sub-observation yearly. It's as if a thousand bank examiners with camcorders followed every detail of the bank pick-up. If you wish to assume other then a common, bank pick-up you have the burden fitting every last one of the observations into your explanation.

That is the same burden you reject in all of your positions: explaining all of the observations.

You people continually demand SOURSE but when sources are cited you whine, quote miner.

The obvious solution is to not quote mine. If Keller did not intend to be understood as claiming that the chubobblex crater event occurred 304,350 years ago don't imply that she did.

The problem with some of you people is that whenever a creationist begins scoring points, you resort to backhanded tactics, such as this or demeaning personal attacks relative to information damaging to your arguments.

I have yet to discover how I would react to a creationist scoring points, but I like to think I'd accept the event with magnanimity. I have erred in the past, but these errors have always been brought to my attention by non-creationists. Dr. Jones* most recently.

It's no wonder dear sister Faith lost her cool and nobody having anything but really thick skin comes here to argue with you people for any length of time.

Ones skin needn't be so thick if ones skull isn't.

I know that you're to old to carbon date, Buz, but science gives no privilege. I come here so people can catch me screwing up.

Edited by lyx2no, : Parallel.

Edited by lyx2no, : Case.

Edited by lyx2no, : Agreement. I've been a bit brutal on the English today. I'd better get it right.

Edited by lyx2no, : I'm tired


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by Buzsaw, posted 05-15-2010 11:58 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
lyx2no
Member (Idle past 3781 days)
Posts: 1277
From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.
Joined: 02-28-2008


Message 246 of 271 (561331)
05-20-2010 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 245 by Buzsaw
05-20-2010 12:18 AM


Water Canopy
Misha, debate on an alleged canopy would be a separate topic. There has been some threads in the archives in which this was debated to some length.

Yes it would be. But it's a topic you've lost before. So why are you repeating it?

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner. In general, a message that should never have been posted.


"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." — Mohmoud Ahmadinejad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by Buzsaw, posted 05-20-2010 12:18 AM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021