Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,900 Year: 4,157/9,624 Month: 1,028/974 Week: 355/286 Day: 11/65 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating Methodology and its Associated Assumptions
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 56 of 217 (147701)
10-06-2004 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Cold Foreign Object
10-05-2004 11:00 PM


The guidelines
Make your points by providing supporting evidence and/or argument. Avoid bare assertions. Because it is often not possible to tell which points will prove controversial, it is acceptable to wait until a point is challenged before supporting it.
You do seem to make a lot of assertions WT. Without any back up. Then you need to be prepared to defend your sources. Which you have been unable to do in the GP threads.
I suggest that you take the time to back up what you say or your privileges to say things will be reduced again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-05-2004 11:00 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by PaulK, posted 10-06-2004 5:12 AM AdminNosy has not replied
 Message 62 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-06-2004 9:46 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 60 of 217 (147924)
10-06-2004 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Cold Foreign Object
10-06-2004 8:55 PM


Confirmed?
The link only points to where you can find the entirity of Lyells work. It does not mention any ages.
Please back up your statement by pointing out in the "Principles of Geology" where Lyell supplies an age for the cretateous.
He may very well have and I would be very impressed indeed if he got it so close at such an early date.
Your job is to pull the quote from Lyell and supply the page number so others can read it in context.
If you refuse to support what you claim then, if you are honest, you will withdraw it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-06-2004 8:55 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 144 of 217 (153967)
10-28-2004 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by NosyNed
10-28-2004 11:51 PM


T o p i c !
Actually if you do want to back this up instead of retracting it then ask and I will start a thread for it since it is way off topic here. Ok?
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 10-28-2004 10:53 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by NosyNed, posted 10-28-2004 11:51 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024