Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and an Old Earth
wj
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 297 (100129)
04-15-2004 12:50 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by RAZD
04-14-2004 11:48 PM


Re: the real gap ...
razd writes:
the rest was jumbled jargonese with no relationship to correlations or actual facts.
Welcome to whateverworld.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by RAZD, posted 04-14-2004 11:48 PM RAZD has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 297 (103016)
04-27-2004 6:30 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by rickrose
04-27-2004 12:48 AM


Re: The Gap Theory (Fossils Young / Earth Old) genesis 1:3/ 1:1
rickrose, irrespective of the length in real time of a "day" in genesis 1, the problem remains that the order fo creation of the specified living organisms is inconsistent with the scientific evidence. How do you explain such anomolies?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by rickrose, posted 04-27-2004 12:48 AM rickrose has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by jar, posted 04-27-2004 10:22 AM wj has not replied
 Message 131 by rickrose, posted 04-27-2004 10:24 AM wj has not replied
 Message 141 by RAZD, posted 04-28-2004 6:41 PM wj has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 218 of 297 (147347)
10-04-2004 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by Cold Foreign Object
10-04-2004 11:01 PM


Only rhetoric?
WT, anything to support your silly assertions or are you relying only on empty rhetoric?
Surprisingly, RAZD is able to string together words such as "absolute minimum", "inferred minimum" and "scientific minimum" with comprehensible meaning rather than the terms which your hero Scott made up.
As usual, WT has conflated cause and effect. The inconsistency of biblical literalism with scientifically testable and observable data caused people to abandon biblical literalism as an accurate description of the past, not people looking for a reason to disbelieve the bible looking for a rationale. Atheism and alternative religions to bible worshipping have existed for far longer than bible worship.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-04-2004 11:01 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 247 of 297 (148271)
10-08-2004 7:24 AM
Reply to: Message 230 by Cold Foreign Object
10-07-2004 2:52 PM


wt writes:
And according to my worldview you are the irrational person because you don't believe that God is the Creator. And the reason you don't believe is because God has punished you for resisting His perceived encroachments one too many times.
Doesn't this say it all? Willow has all the rationalisation to reject anything that threatens his personal fantasies. Who needs an alternative explanation for correlations of dating methodologies when you have this intellectual defence available?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-07-2004 2:52 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-08-2004 4:15 PM wj has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 253 of 297 (148581)
10-09-2004 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by Cold Foreign Object
10-08-2004 10:26 PM


Re: Interpreting the Evidence
Yep, another satire-challenged creationist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-08-2004 10:26 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024