Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does radio-carbon dating disprove evolution?
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 219 of 308 (476485)
07-24-2008 7:56 AM 		Reply to: Message 216 by johnfolton
07-24-2008 3:13 AM

Re: Cold Fusion ?
PaulK writes:
​
What you need to produce is one person who claims that Cold Fusion IS responsible for C14.
​
Glad to see no one claims C14 being generated within the earth.
​
Is this level of logical ineptitude meant to make us laugh, or are you looking for pity?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by johnfolton, posted 07-24-2008 3:13 AM johnfolton has not replied
  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 246 of 308 (476598)
07-25-2008 3:23 AM 		Reply to: Message 240 by johnfolton
07-24-2008 11:48 PM

Re: Nonsense
Kent Hovind one of the greatest scientific minds of our time
​
This is truly pathetic. John tries to pass hismelf off as some science-savy creationist, and then pulls a line like this revealing nothing but ignorance. The sad truth is John is being fed all his lines by the worst creationist websites, and he has not a single original (or correct) thought in his head. What a complete waste of time. John makes Beretta seem like a bastion of rationality. Bring back Ray...
This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by johnfolton, posted 07-24-2008 11:48 PM johnfolton has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by johnfolton, posted 07-25-2008 8:22 AM cavediver has replied
  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 250 of 308 (476610)
07-25-2008 9:37 AM 		Reply to: Message 248 by johnfolton
07-25-2008 8:22 AM

Re: Nonsense
You should educate yourself in the sciences not just the quantum stuff.
​
Um, you do realise that this whole topic around C14 *IS* "quantum stuff"
​
And you're probably right - Kent would have me for lunch, for the simple reason that I would be uncontrollably ROTFLMAO and quite unable to speak
This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by johnfolton, posted 07-25-2008 8:22 AM johnfolton has not replied
  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 277 of 308 (476792)
07-26-2008 8:12 PM 		Reply to: Message 275 by ReformedRob
07-26-2008 7:51 PM

Re: How dilution of C14 affect fossilation ratio of carbon to change
The fact that organic samples that are supposed to be fossilized found in layers presumed to hundreds of millions of years old and have no c14 have yielded dates in the tens of thousands of years is proof of the bias inherent in dating techniques.
​
Oh. Dear. God. Just when you thought the stupidity could not get any worse
​
Have you read anything in this thread??? Have you any clues as to why meaurements may throw up dates in the tens of thousands of years???
This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by ReformedRob, posted 07-26-2008 7:51 PM ReformedRob has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by ReformedRob, posted 07-26-2008 8:21 PM cavediver has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024