Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New helium retention work suggests young earth and accelerated decay
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 116 of 122 (222049)
07-06-2005 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Admin
06-24-2005 8:58 AM


Re: I am a little puzzled by the logic here.
Admin, I have no idea of the specific claims of dynamic control of whatever the discussion was, and have not read the whole thread, but I am a little puzzled in one respect about the views of mainstream physics or science in general.
QM was presented and discussed with quite bit of metaphysical or even mystical type ideas such as the need for a universal observer potentially, and Max Plank even attributed the manifestation of matter to a Mind directed by an Intelligent Force.
But if anyone dares speak in those terms, evolutionists are very disparaging and suggest no credible scientist would do so, that it is not real science, etc, etc,.....You especially see this type a priori dismissal in reference to IDers.
But Max Plank, Niels Bohr, John Wheeler and men like that were or are, imo, real scientists conducting real science, and made statements about the logical conclusions of what they observed in physics, and those observations were often touching on what might be termed metaphysical concepts.
It seems to me often disingenious on the part of evolutionists when they speak of "science" or mainstream science because they often would deride the thinking of men like Wheeler or Max Plank, as far as what they believed QM pointed to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Admin, posted 06-24-2005 8:58 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Joe Meert, posted 07-19-2005 10:43 PM randman has not replied
 Message 119 by Admin, posted 07-20-2005 8:49 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024