Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noahs ark is a physical impossibility
Zephan
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 71 (32354)
02-16-2003 6:41 AM


Good points Philip.
I always laugh at the non-believer quoting scripture to bolster their argument. Satan tried the same thing in the wilderness, and it didn't work there either.
Anyway, I would personally like to see the anomoly in Turkey explored to ascertain once and for all if Mt. Ararat truly contains a man made structure some believe might be Noah's Ark...
Why all the secrecy here?
Because there is much more at stake than confirming the historical event of Noah's Ark. Go ask Metatron, SLPx, John, et al. who would all prefer an in home visit from Jesus Christ Himself before they would believe.

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by David unfamous, posted 02-17-2003 5:26 AM Zephan has replied
 Message 29 by derwood, posted 02-18-2003 1:44 PM Zephan has not replied

  
Zephan
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 71 (32417)
02-17-2003 7:25 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by David unfamous
02-17-2003 5:26 AM


Au contraire.
I wasn't speaking to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by David unfamous, posted 02-17-2003 5:26 AM David unfamous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by nator, posted 02-18-2003 9:01 AM Zephan has not replied

  
Zephan
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 71 (32418)
02-17-2003 7:36 AM


quote:
I have tried for a year to get him to define those terms he uses as his amazing "evidence", but have had zero success.
He likes to make up his own terminology a lot.
So why don't you define "evidence" for us counselor. I didn't realize there was only one kind, although most evolutionists believe this to be true.
And once you give us an acceptable definition (you won't because it is way over your head), provide some guidelines as to how we should qualify the evidence. Or don't bother as this is probably way too difficult for you.
But if you do, I suggest you begin with defining "circumstantial" evidence. This might be a good place to start given the fact that you've built your entire belief in evolution solely on circumstantial evidence.

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Percy, posted 02-17-2003 10:02 AM Zephan has not replied
 Message 28 by nator, posted 02-18-2003 9:08 AM Zephan has not replied
 Message 30 by derwood, posted 02-18-2003 1:47 PM Zephan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024