Percy,
quote:
Back In Black/Zephan/Apple Toast: My point was to help you see the issue clearer since you failed to provide peer reviewed literature to back up your unsupported beliefs.
It was this snippet that made me realise I'd heard this line before. Apparently we must provide scientific peer reviewed papers to show that something isn't linked to something else (ie prove a negative) when no one suggests that they are anyway. Methinks the burden of proof is the other way around, or if it isn't, I want scientific peer reviewed articles that show that apples aren't oranges.
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.