Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,878 Year: 4,135/9,624 Month: 1,006/974 Week: 333/286 Day: 54/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Are Christians Afraid To Doubt?
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1372 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 136 of 300 (392412)
03-31-2007 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by Phat
03-30-2007 9:14 AM


my points of difficulty
arachnophilia writes:
we fear (or know) in our hearts that if we question too much, it will all come crashing down.
i question as much as i can, but i have still found lines that i will not cross.
I contend that IF God is real, there is no way that my belief would ever come crashing down.
is god real?
this is the question, afterall. everything else is really beating around the bush. it's the fundamental doubt. it's a question i consider, sure, but not one i ever seriously entertain.
I believe that there is a power greater than myself. If I took away all of my woo-woo moments, I could allow myself to question His existence, but there again is a boundary that I hesitate to cross. I don't know why. (BTW folks, my woo woo moments were quite serious. I don't use the term lightly!
by "woo-woo" do you mean religious experiences? i have come to be high skeptical of any claimed religious experience (including my own), and have all but discarded the notion. on what do i now base my faith? another question i cannot seriously consider.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Phat, posted 03-30-2007 9:14 AM Phat has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1372 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 137 of 300 (392413)
03-31-2007 1:24 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by macaroniandcheese
03-29-2007 5:55 PM


Re: short and simple
i've pretty much gotten to the end of religion and even into the concept of a maleficent god. so. i don't really know what's left.
yet you seem to still have faith.
is the neccessary ultimate conclusion of questioning abandoning faith? it seems to stand up pretty poorly against doubt.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-29-2007 5:55 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by macaroniandcheese, posted 04-01-2007 10:57 AM arachnophilia has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 138 of 300 (392415)
03-31-2007 2:18 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by ringo
03-30-2007 11:37 AM


Aha! Keyboard's working again! I was muted for a while there. Anyone thankful for that situation should give credit where it is due: Microsoft.
Ringo writes:
Faith without doubt is blind acceptance.
A fight between 16,332 Amazon women from Jupiter armed with pitchforks, and 11,880 Andromedans armed with machetes is an interstellar battle.
I can also create definitions of things that don't exist.
There is some basis for every belief. It may not be valid, as in the case of an hallucination; but there is always some basis.
The closest thing I know of to truly blind faith is the statement "There is no god." Even that has a weak, fragile basis of sorts at this time. (Clue: try circular reasoning, or just accept the common brainwashing hype which employs it.)
And questions are the prerequisite for answers. Do you stop questioning just because you're afraid of the answers you might get?
No. I do not. Many people do not. I suppose some do. I haven't taken a poll. I may be atypical.
For me, my aversion to unpleasant answers is weaker than than my aversion to making bad choices based upon incomplete information.
I may have an idea what your getting at. Would it be best for Christians to grab hold of any doubt they can - even one based on a misrepresentation of scripture - just so they can abandon their faith and join the ranks of the scoffers? Are you that desperate for fellowship?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by ringo, posted 03-30-2007 11:37 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by ringo, posted 03-31-2007 3:57 AM CTD has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 139 of 300 (392419)
03-31-2007 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by CTD
03-31-2007 2:18 AM


CTD writes:
Would it be best for Christians to grab hold of any doubt they can....
You miss the point completely. It isn't about "grabbing hold" of doubts. It's about acknowledging the doubts that are there.
... even one based on a misrepresentation of scripture....
And many doubts are about the interpretation of scripture. Should we accept what we have been spoon-fed? Or should we try to understand?
... just so they can abandon their faith and join the ranks of the scoffers?
It's not about "abandoning faith" at all - it's about strengthening your faith. You must have a very weak faith indeed if you're afraid to test it.
Are you that desperate for fellowship?
I haven't asked for fellowship. I don't need to.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by CTD, posted 03-31-2007 2:18 AM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 140 of 300 (392420)
03-31-2007 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by nator
03-30-2007 7:53 AM


I missed this one
So, what do you make of the fact that the greatest determining factor that decides what religion someone follows is the religion of their parents and the culture they were raised in?
Umm... Well, if it is indeed so, I'd say the atheistic indoctrination policies have a long way to go before they can claim success.
I predict the movement will increasingly try to separate children from parents and pursue every means available to fragment families.
I'm not sure where this leads, but it'll take work to keep it on topic.
Maybe "children tend not to doubt their parents" is what you're getting at?
Might as well get after this one too
Larni writes:
Well, yes, I certainly do.
Thats the foundation of building trust. You trust that someone will act in a way they perport to.
Following multiple examples of congruous behaviour we can be confident we can predict the behaviour of a trusted individual to an acceptable level of certainty.
I trust my friends because they have acted in a demonstrably concistant manner towards me.
Makes sense.
Larni continues:
One is asked to trust without any demonstration of the trust worthyness of a god or religion.
Maybe in some religions; not for the Christian. We have a report of God's demonstrations, and we have present day experience as well. Isaiah 53 begins with "Who hath believed our report?" The question is as important as it ever was.
I'll abbreviate this, as I expect some will find it unpleasant. I was once in Ohio and pretty hungry. My own money had run out, but I had some money which wasn't my own available to borrow. I prayed about the matter and ordered a pizza, intending to borrow & repay after I got home. Pizza arrived late - ontime guarantee - free pizza.
You have the option of calling this a coincidence. You have the option of considering it a lie. I was there. I do not. I've ordered many a pizza, and only twice have I got a free meal due to an ontime guarantee. Statistically it's less than 1%.
Why should God care about such an apparently trivial thing? Why ask why? I'm convinced He does. Some Christians observe more events of this nature, and some observe less. It may be that some encounter more; or it may be that some are more observant.
Now are we somehow mistaken if we fail to doubt our observations? Surely the observations of others should then be subject to a greater degree of doubt. Or is it a mistake to consider even a "micromiracle" as evidence of God's love and care?
On the other hand, we have examples like Exodus 16. About 6 weeks after departing from Egypt THROUGH the Red Sea, the Isrealites were full of doubt. If one is determined enough, one can doubt just about anything. I don't know what the limit is, and I guess that's one question I'm content to leave unanswered.
For those who really enjoy doubting God, that story should make your day, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by nator, posted 03-30-2007 7:53 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Phat, posted 03-31-2007 5:58 AM CTD has not replied
 Message 143 by nator, posted 03-31-2007 8:00 AM CTD has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 141 of 300 (392422)
03-31-2007 5:58 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by CTD
03-31-2007 4:05 AM


Re: I missed this one
a free pizza is not a miracle. Now, if the pizza was free and it fed 5000 neighbors, we may have something!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by CTD, posted 03-31-2007 4:05 AM CTD has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 142 of 300 (392429)
03-31-2007 7:45 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by Rob
03-30-2007 10:11 PM


Re: Look Before You Leap
However, I am careful in who's advice I take
quote:
Yes. I suppose winding up on a cross does not appear sensible to you...
LOL!
I was alluding to YOUR advice, genious, not Jesus'. Or, do you think you actually ARE Jesus these days?
And how arrogant of you to assume that I haven't heard about Jesus before. I was raised a Christian, Rob. I was a believer. I had many years of religious instruction. None of this is new to me.
So, why are YOU afraid to doubt any part of your belief, Rob?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Rob, posted 03-30-2007 10:11 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Rob, posted 03-31-2007 11:06 AM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 143 of 300 (392430)
03-31-2007 8:00 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by CTD
03-31-2007 4:05 AM


Re: I missed this one
So, what do you make of the fact that the greatest determining factor that decides what religion someone follows is the religion of their parents and the culture they were raised in?
quote:
Umm... Well, if it is indeed so, I'd say the atheistic indoctrination policies have a long way to go before they can claim success.
Huh?
quote:
I predict the movement will increasingly try to separate children from parents and pursue every means available to fragment families.
What "movement"?
quote:
I'm not sure where this leads, but it'll take work to keep it on topic.
Maybe "children tend not to doubt their parents" is what you're getting at?
What I'm getting at is your statement:
quote:
By definition the Christian has ruled out other gods. I'm not aware of any that can really compete. I know of only one God who even claims to have sent His Son to suffer and die for me. Is it rational or irrational to conclude that He loves me more than the wanna-be's?
My point is that most people don't truly "choose" their own religion. They generally are indoctrinated into a general category of faithy as children (Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, etc) and that's where they stay as adults. Very few people are raised with no religion at all and then, once they begin asking questions, are encouraged to go on a comprehensive spiritual search of the thousands of world religions to find the one that speaks to them. Rather, the vast majority stick with what they were taught, or something very similar. Culture also has an influence here, obviously. If you grow up without religion in your family but are surrounded by Christians, celebrate Christian holidays, see Christians on TV, hear about politician's Christian beliefs, and see Christian churches on every other corner in most towns and cities rather than, say, Hindus and Hindu temples, you are quite a bit more likely, wouldn't you say, to think about Christianity as a "normal", viable religion to consider. If you DO decide to embrace a religion is is quite likely that you will embrace Christianity, especially if you have never even met a single Hindu or have never seen a single Hindu temple, or don't know the first thing about the Hindu religion.
So, for you to claim that your personal version of the Christian God is the "real" one is a rather naieve statement. It assumes that everybody truly "chooses" their religion.
I contend that region and parentage "chooses" most people's religion for them.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by CTD, posted 03-31-2007 4:05 AM CTD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by CTD, posted 03-31-2007 11:31 AM nator has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 144 of 300 (392438)
03-31-2007 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
03-26-2007 5:03 PM


Re-Doubt
Hi Phat,
Discuss why Christians or anyone else should or should not doubt,
I don't claim to be a Christian just a Child of the King. So I guess that would put me in the anyone else crowd.
I have been reading these posts for some time now and I have a lot of doubts, but I do not know what your limits are here as to what doubts I can express, and why I should have those doubts.
There are some things I do not doubt can these be included?
Phat, would you please clarify for me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 03-26-2007 5:03 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by Phat, posted 04-02-2007 8:42 PM ICANT has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 145 of 300 (392439)
03-31-2007 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by nator
03-31-2007 7:45 AM


Re: Look Before You Leap
Nator:
LOL!
I was alluding to YOUR advice, genius, not Jesus'. Or, do you think you actually ARE Jesus these days?
I think my faults speak for themselves. I try to reflect Christ, but am no Christ... I believe He lives in me, but He is only as visible as I allow Him to be, by way of laying down my own foolish pride. There is a difference!
Nator, I understand the difficulties. I know the struggles. We may not agree, but can we begin, with curtiousy, to attempt to communicate for a change? I have tried and tried to seperate myself from my emotions throughout the last months. To deny myself and be patient. I am only a man...
Please do take the time to read the following explainations. To wave them off and wish it away is just laziness. We must think clearly on these matters. Please
You can weigh my words on whatever scale you wish, but consider for yourself... 'what is the only possible legitimate scale'?
Perhaps the Bible is not the Word of God. But unless God has revealed Himself, then we have no basis for labling anything as 'true or false' in the ultimate metaphysical sense, other than by our own prejudice (the very thing we seek to escape).
Our only tool for understanding is that which is understandable. A coherent and logical examination of ideas. Some of which may only register 'intuitively' until the connections are made within strict intellectual terms. It's hard work Nator. That is the purpose and nature of Theology; to seperate the wheat from the chaff...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Preaching hidden as off topic. Those who wish to read, please hit peek. If any other admin disagrees with this, the text is still here - AA
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you want the truth with all of your heart, all of your mind, and all of your strength then go get it, it's free to all men (and women of course). But if you don't seek it above all else, then what is it you really want?
What must we worship above all else, if not the truth? It simply has to be our sole intent. We must be committed to nothing less. That is why we are commanded to worship only God. Not for his ego, but for the answers to our own questions (if we really want them).
Hear me out... Test me with fire, and see if I am not a reasonable man (at least this morning... I have bad days too you know?).
Certainly the Bible cannot be claimed by mere men to be the Word of God. I could just as easily say that the 'Unibomber's Manifesto' (or whatever it is called) is the inspired word of God. Someone would have to come from God in order to say what is really true with any authority. An alien visitation if you will, from the absolute side of reality in eternity, to the relative side of reality in time.
Men are not trustworthy with such responsibilities. They carry thier own name even if they are unconscious of the fact. They have no power to overcome themselves. They are prisoners to this side of reality.
Only God Himself has the authority to affirm 'so-called' Scripture. I think that is an important point.
And we instinctively look for contradictions so as to test truth claims. There's another clue!
The question is, has He done so? Or is that also an invention of man?
Certainly the test of logical consistency is not man's invention. We apply it to others and conveniently forget to use it to test our own worldview.
If you find any of my words and ideas contradicting those of Christ (whom you imply is trustworthy), I insist that you rebuke me. Because Jesus made it clear that He did not judge by human standards, but by the Word of God. And in this way, He confirmed that the scriptures are the final authority. That is His teaching. So do you believe Him as you implied? It's a tough sell huh?
It's rightly fightening!
John 8:13 The Pharisees challenged him, "Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid." 14 Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me.
John 10:33 "We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God." 34 Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'? 35 If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came--and the Scripture cannot be broken-- 36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? 37 Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does.
Jesus never broke the scriptures Nator. He came to fulfill, not to abolish...
Matthew 5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
So if you want to label Him a fundamentalist and show your own prejudice, and nail Him to the cross spiritually and intellectually, keep in mind that in the final scene of the drama, you are being the very fundamentalist you wish to escape from. The truth is exclusive. Jesus is either telling the truth, or is just another man who is deluded to a degree unprecedented in human History. And unless delusion is truely and manifestly bad, then there is no discernable difference between delusion and sanity.
This applies even more so to 'Fundies' like me... If Jesus was persecuted for claiming to be God's son in the begotten sense of the historical context (which is the same thing as being God), then how much more despised am I for following this lunatic?
Matthew 10:16-42
16 I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. 17 "Be on your guard against men; they will hand you over to the local councils and flog you in their synagogues. 18 On my account you will be brought before governors and kings as witnesses to them and to the Gentiles. 19 But when they arrest you, do not worry about what to say or how to say it. At that time you will be given what to say, 20 for it will not be you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you. 21 "Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. 22 All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved. 23 When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. I tell you the truth, you will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes. 24 "A student is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master. 25 It is enough for the student to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master. If the head of the house has been called Beelzebub, how much more the members of his household! 26 "So do not be afraid of them. There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.
'Crazy' is historically attributed to demonic influence, and I quite agree. These ideational little wizards create all kinds of false dichotomies that are very difficult to expose and exorcise.
But one simple tool that is at the heart of God's own intellect (and inseperable from His nature of Love) is the law of non-contradiction. And with this simple tool, we cn expose the little snakes, and take them up and drink their poison unharmed.
His thoughts are one of exquisitely logical analysis. A thing of manifest beauty, far beyond mere machanical thinking. He is not only reasonable, but also undeceivable. And that is just one of the things that make Him so beautiful.
But to dismiss my words as my words is unfair if they are indeed coherent, because I do not own clear thinking. I posess it in the sense that I have accepted it. But I am really only allowing it to posess me!
It also causes a problem for some of you...
On one hand, you ask me to think for myself. And then when I put a long string of coherent sentances together to develop sound concepts and ideas, you dismiss it as Rob's truth (Ringo even adds a 'TM').
I neither am logic (truth), nor did I invent it. But without it, I am not making reasonable arguments. Thinking clearly (I assure you) leads to only one place in this world of irrational devils... the cross. But the irony is, that because I see, I am not afraid of you.
I come in the name of Jesus... not as Jesus. If you are looking for Jesus, you'll have to look for a David Koresh, or another Heaven's Gate type of individual.
It is believeable to you if people come in their own name? These rationalists think for themselves (as so many say they respect); as though they have the capacity to transcend this earth and it's many physical and spiritual chains, either confirming or denying the existence of God and expounding upon His true nature. I am afraid it is not possible.
Jesus talked about it all. It is written you know?
John 5:43 I have come in my Father's name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him.
So when I claim that what Jesus Himself said is true (that we can be born again) because He opened my eyes and I now see, you reject me as a liar and manipulator?
I did not open my own eyes... I allowed Him to do so. It's the easiest thing in the world, and also the hardest. It is free, yet cost me everything in terms of the respect of my peers.
What is it you want?
Nator:
And how arrogant of you to assume that I haven't heard about Jesus before. I was raised a Christian, Rob. I was a believer. I had many years of religious instruction. None of this is new to me.
Those are the very things Jesus caim to preach against Nator. It's not about blind allegiance, religious practices, and cultural tradition.
You rightly rejected such emptiness...
It is about understanding (seeing) what it is He actually said. The words mean nothing if you don't take the time to comprehend them and consume them in such a manner. It think you must have caught the Spirit of it, because I see no other explantion for your compliment of my supposed genius.
It's not genius Nator... it is the Holy Spirit of God trying to reach you by way of an imbecil like me.
So now, you take it... and follow it and examine it for yourself. You don't need me, you need the real living and breathing Christ of which it is my greatest honor to share with you.
So, why are YOU afraid to doubt any part of your belief, Rob?
Nator, I want you to listen to me... there is no part of my belief (that I am aware of), that I have failed to examine with such maniacal scrutiny as to send the 'merely religious' among us, running for cover in fear of their lives.
Not much arrogance left here... it dies daily, though admittedly kicking and screaming like the devil it is.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminAsgara, : proselytizing efforts hidden as off topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by nator, posted 03-31-2007 7:45 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by nator, posted 03-31-2007 7:07 PM Rob has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 146 of 300 (392440)
03-31-2007 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by nator
03-31-2007 8:00 AM


Whatever
Like when I said "Maybe 'children tend not to doubt their parents' is what you're getting at?"
Of course you can't simply reply "yes." You have to call my view "a rather naieve statement", while saying the same thing in a lot more words. Am I supposed to be impressed, or confused?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by nator, posted 03-31-2007 8:00 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by nator, posted 03-31-2007 7:47 PM CTD has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 147 of 300 (392442)
03-31-2007 12:11 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by ringo
03-30-2007 11:37 AM


TOPIC SYNOPSIS II
purpledawn writes:
I don't feel the journey has an "end". It is continual spiritual growth.
I agree and, for me, the spiritual growth is knowing God through His manifestation in myself and others.
nator writes:
Neither the AA or the Christian Step 3 would work for me.
My life and my will are just that. My life. My will.
Nator, our differences in our approach to growth and destiny are the classic issues between freethinkers and believers. Freethinkers cherish the ability to critically think and examine. The ability to question answers is itself a sacred gift from God. Jar and I discuss this. Jar maintains that God is unknowable. I believe that God is knowable. I agree with purpledawn in that it is a lifelong process, however.
nator writes:
One of the most useful things I learned during my recovery is that I am the only one who controls me.
And I would agree insofar as it is I who consciously chooses to commit my life...
Rob writes:
We're all raised in relatively abusive homes. And that is because sin is really sin, and it hurts and damages us deeply.
And no formula works for everyone. As a believer, I used to avow that Jesus was/is the only answer and personally, I still believe that this is so. I no longer preach it, however. God is showing me that each individual whom I interact with has a unique and special makeup to them. I don't push anything on anyone anymore unless I feel that it is what I should do. (and you may ask how I can trust my feelings.) I just do. I don't justify myself to anyone else but me.(and God)
nator writes:
I just have no clue why someone who is struggling with life would think it is a good idea to just give up on themselves.
As this pertains to me and my recovery and counseling choices, I will say that I have never given up on myself. I simply allowed myself to be accountable and able to accept direction from sources besides myself.
Rob writes:
So when I said I live for another world (I actually thought you might jump on that) I didn't say it well. What I was driving at was that, since this world is in disarray, we should look to adapt to it.
But thats what irritates me about your approach. You attempt to decide for us how we all should approach the puzzle. You should do what you believe. As far as we goes, thats up to each of us individually. I realize that I am touting relativism, but relativism is the way that people operate. Many people do not desire for morality, truth, or authority to be legislated or even suggested. And I have come to respect that. After all, God never makes me do anything...why should I make you do anything?
Rob,to Nator writes:
We have a responsibility to each other, and the fact you respond to me proves that you do care what others think.
In the context of this forum, I strongly believe that my only responsibility is the freedom to express my view.
Rob writes:
Just keep in mind Phat, that this is not a small group. And also remember that Jesus embodied all of the qualities of understanding. He had both your greatest insight and patience, as well as the fire and certitude of my boldest sermon.
He had the balance that none of us can achieve. That is the whole reason we need the rest of the body. We are meant to work as a team.
If we are collectively meant to work as a team, the insight will be verified in our actions and will be validated by the results. We are not meant to attempt to lead the team (or group of individuals) to a collective goal. That is Gods job. Remember that He who began a good work...shall be faithful to complete it. I never worry about being a Shepherd anymore.
CTD writes:
ah, what's the use! I've surely lost you by now.
You never had him to begin with!
nator writes:
I "create" myself every day. Years ago, I re-created myself quite radically when I decided that I didn't want to behave like my old self behaved. Of course, the "project" that is me is never finished, and I will continue to change and grow (I hope!) until my last moment.
I agree in that We become the decisions that we make. I never do anything simply because I am told to do so, when it involves matters of spirituality and belief. The unction must become real to me before I act on it.
Ringo writes:
Faith without doubt is blind acceptance.
And the only reason to accept anything blindly is because one of your other "senses" cleared the runway for takeoff!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by ringo, posted 03-30-2007 11:37 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by ringo, posted 03-31-2007 2:10 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 149 by CTD, posted 03-31-2007 6:37 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 154 by Stile, posted 03-31-2007 7:54 PM Phat has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 148 of 300 (392451)
03-31-2007 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Phat
03-31-2007 12:11 PM


Re: TOPIC SYNOPSIS II
Phat writes:
Faith without doubt is blind acceptance.
And the only reason to accept anything blindly is because one of your other "senses" cleared the runway for takeoff!
That's an interesting take on it. You doubt your sight so much and you trust your other senses so much that you're willing to fly the plane by smell and sound? (I'm guessing that touch and taste have limited value in flying an airplane.)
Such misplaced doubts seem kinda... um, er, uh... insane.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Phat, posted 03-31-2007 12:11 PM Phat has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5897 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 149 of 300 (392473)
03-31-2007 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Phat
03-31-2007 12:11 PM


Maybe somewhat OT
Phat writes:
Jar maintains that God is unknowable. I believe that God is knowable.
I've always maintained this would depend a lot less upon us than what God intends the situation to be.
If God wants to be undetectable, or render us collectively or individually incapable of detecting Him, I suggest He could manage to do so.
If God wants to get in one's face, or summon one to His location, what's to stop Him from doing so?
These are the two extreme cases. I think the truth is somewhere in between. Not all would accept sin = barrier & free will & other biblical concepts.
I hope this helps you two can make some headway with your discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Phat, posted 03-31-2007 12:11 PM Phat has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 150 of 300 (392476)
03-31-2007 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Rob
03-31-2007 11:06 AM


Re: Look Before You Leap
So, why are YOU afraid to doubt any part of your belief, Rob?
quote:
Nator, I want you to listen to me... there is no part of my belief (that I am aware of), that I have failed to examine with such maniacal scrutiny as to send the 'merely religious' among us, running for cover in fear of their lives.
But you've stopped doubting, right?
Why?
quote:
Not much arrogance left here... it dies daily, though admittedly kicking and screaming like the devil it is.
The minute you stop preaching and start actually responding to what people write here, I'll say that you've lost your arrogance.
Anybody who relentlessly nags others to convert to his religion is insufferably, enormously arrogant.
Can you think of who I am referring to, Rob?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Rob, posted 03-31-2007 11:06 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Rob, posted 03-31-2007 7:51 PM nator has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024