Hey B2P,
Since you accused me of laying a guilt trip on you in another thread, I feel this is partly the result of my statements so I should respond.
I was not attempting to lay a guilt trip on you, but rather to find out what you were going to teach? From where are you going to gain your wisdom to feed to your flock? Surely you want to teach the truth. So what truth are you going to teach, and how do you know it's the truth? If your teaching comes from yourself, it is human and flawed and I could care less what you say. If your teaching comes from scriptures which you admit are errant, then why should I sit and listen to your speculations about what the truth MAY be?
So you THINK Jesus Christ was probably Lord, the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob? Great! But how do I know you're right? If you can't assure me that you are right about this, then why should I waste my time?
I could not possibly maintain your stance. I can either be an agnostic/athiest or a hardcore Christian. I could not possibly preach something that I wasn't convinced was true. If I am not assured of the veracity of my teachings I don't see the point in even opening my mouth. Either the Bible is inspired and therefore trustworthy, or it is not. If it is not trustworthy, why should I believe in Christ?
If you are not going to use the Bible in your sermons except as anecdotes in a moral lesson, then what makes your teachings more valid than anyone else's? If they are not more valid, then what's the point?
Sigh... I just don't get it.