truthlover writes:
I call this the "two in two" theory, ... God has a son. ... The Son showed up many times as God's "angel." Those who saw him seemed to recognize him as divine, and referred to him as Yahweh or God, but also referred to him as "the Angel of God."
Would you say that 'angel of the LORD' is an equivalent saying? But, of course you would. The two sayings are presented equivalently in scripture, so far as I am aware. The problem with your 'two in two' theory, as I see it, is that except for the anointed king of Israel, none other, in the OT is referred to as 'Son of God.'
... The appearances of God on earth in the Tanach were the Son. Thus Yahweh on earth can call down fire from Yahweh in heaven in Genesis, and Yahweh can be sent by Yahweh
The 'angel of the LORD' is very busy throughout the Old Testament.
The 'angel of the LORD' called to Abraham from heaven. Genesis 22:11
'God,' 'the LORD,' and 'the angel of the LORD,' are used equivalently in the 'burning bush' narrative. Exodus 3:4-6
The 'angel of the LORD' provides military assistance to the Israeli's as they flee Egypt (Exodus 14:19) and leads the attack on Canaan (Ex. 23:20,23; 33:2).
The 'angel of the LORD' kills 70,000 Israeli's (1 Chronicles 21:12) and 30,000 Assyrians (Isaiah 37:36).
If you take 'the angel of the LORD' to be God in human form, then how many times was he incarnated? How many times did he appear in the flesh before becoming known as the man 'Jesus who is called Christ.'?
"O Israel, listen: Jehovah is our God, Jehovah alone." Deuteronomy 6:4 Living Bible
"Thus says the LORD ... 'besides me there is no god.'" Isaiah 44:6 Revised Standard
I realize this is a complex study. The purpose of this post is, if nothing else, to demonstrate that neither the 'three in one' theory nor the 'two in one' theory do justice to the evidence. Is there a multiplicity of gods represented? Certainly. But only the
One God for Israel.
------------------
"I was very unwilling to give up my belief." Charles Darwin