Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   One of the many things evolutionists avoid to respond
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 46 (19822)
10-14-2002 1:41 AM


All
The primary unanswered point here, and near punctuated equilibrium, let alone evoltuion, killer, is that we can see beautiful gradual evolution in the fossil record up a geological column covering million of years in shell-fish paleontology for example. We can track the morphology change - the shape changes, the swirls increase in helicity.
But when we want to see the origin of genuine novelty. Can we see that? No.
We see microevolution in the fossil record over millions of years and hundreds of feet of strata. When we are after the introduction of genuine novelty its record is suspiciously, completely systematically, absent and occurs in a split second of geological time.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 10-14-2002]

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Tranquility Base, posted 10-15-2002 8:07 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 43 by peter borger, posted 10-15-2002 10:00 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 46 (19960)
10-15-2002 8:07 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Tranquility Base
10-14-2002 1:41 AM


^ Bump

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Tranquility Base, posted 10-14-2002 1:41 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Mammuthus, posted 10-16-2002 4:24 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024