Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Punctuated equilibrium vs spontaneous generation
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 54 (259988)
11-15-2005 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Skeptick
02-17-2004 4:07 AM


I guess this post warrants further reply (despite that it is over a year and a half old, and that Skeptick is no longer with us).
The quotes
The addition of PE to neo- Darwinian 'theory' effectively renders the very concept of evolution itself untestable.
and
quote:
Look closely and you'll notice something; there is NO FOSSIL EVIDENCE in the "forks" of the branches (where the scientists claim there is a "transition".
The fossil record is not the only evidence for evolution; it is not even the best evidence for evolution. Now the fossil record is excellent evidence, indeed; however, Darwin did not make use of the fossil record in formulating his theory (it was pretty meager in his day), and there is plenty of evidence in other fields of biology that should remove doubt about the theory of evolution even without the fossil record.
Also, as I said, the fossil record does remain excellent evidence for the theory of evolution. The writer of this post does not seem to understand the nature of the evidence.
Both of these points have been beaten to death on other threads, but there is no reason, I guess, not to have another go at it.

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Skeptick, posted 02-17-2004 4:07 AM Skeptick has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 54 (260072)
11-15-2005 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by randman
11-15-2005 9:21 PM


Too bad his post didn't contain any facts
I just checked the Member List; it doesn't appear to me that Skeptick was banned.

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by randman, posted 11-15-2005 9:21 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by randman, posted 11-15-2005 8:55 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 54 (260194)
11-16-2005 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by randman
11-15-2005 8:55 PM


member list
Yes, but if you look at various names on the Member List, little marks appear by the names if the individual has been suspended.
On the other hand, I don't think little marks appear if the person is merely restricted to particular forums.
{Adminnemooseus inserts - All you say above is correct, at least for the members current status. There would be no indication of a suspension that was later lifted. But all this is very off-topic. Take any further discussion of such to the proper place.}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 11-16-2005 01:28 PM

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by randman, posted 11-15-2005 8:55 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024