There are many living transitional species, like amphibians, or even the hippopotamus, clearly in a state of transition between land and water life.
Is this really true (I'm asking for information/opinions from the many people here who know more about this stuff than I do rather than actually challenging the statement) ?
Since evolution is undirected can we really say something is clearly in a state of transition - couldn't it just as well :
- stay the same as it currently is forever - or until extinction at least
- reverse "direction" and end up going back to being fully aquatic or terrestial
Aren't we limited to saying it is in a state where it could potentially transition from being aquatic to terrestial or vice versa ? If I'm wrong then why - what am I missing ?
Confused ? You will be...