Evolutionary Theory Explains Diversity

I think the diversities of life and the complexities of life can best be describe as interrelation and not evolution.Interrelation is the process of all individual organism to survive which respect to its time, its surrounding and its condition.

​

When I say
"process", I mean the way how a living organism copes, reacts, interacts, behaves and responds
"survive", I mean to maintain life, on the organism's maximum ability to live
"time", I mean the designated era that we can verify geologically
"surroundings", I mean nature (or members or parts of nature) and the common interrelated originator (CIO) besides the concerned organism or species
"condition", I mean the actual state of the organism

​

From http://www.interrelation-theory.com

Well, I came here to discuss that TOE is now already an obsolete and old theory. Maybe you did not see my web site. Look and see so that you may know.

Okay, that is good.Thank you.

Oh thanks, for posting it here one of the mechanism. I'm preparing to post it here.Of course, since you are following the TOE, then, you will surely say that Interrelation Theory is wrong. Anybody can say that. I can say that too to TOE. But if you will understand Interrelation Theory better is that the reason why organisms are changing is not because they are evolving by natural process with no purpose, but they are interrelating with a purpose as we see it in nature. And they are interrelating becausu they are preserving their life. The opposite of the TOE.Yes, this is the biotic preservation mechanism. And it is excatly the opposite of natural selection.And the peer review, I've writen it there in the web page. I got pity of the peer reviewer. How will he knew if my theory is right or wrong by using just only one theory that is not neutral? (I am not saying neutral theory in TOE).There is more in Interrelaton Theory than that. But thanks.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.

Thanks for the questions1. You mentioned a purpose figuring in your theory of interrelation. Just out of interest, where does this purpose come from?
ANSWER: Well, since all living organisms have purposely protect their life, then, the most plausible explanation for that is the giver of life to them. Is it nature? Is it alien? Is it God? I called it the common interrelated originator in my Interrelation Theory. Since I am a Christian, I will assuredly say that it is God who had created life but since I can't present to you in physical form now, then, maybe I'm wrong. But the giver of life is the cause of that since it is testable and observable.And how does it influence the way organisms change?
ANSWER: By simple test and observation tells me in the Interrelation Theory that organisms may loose its parts or members of its parts to change, just to gain its life. I mean, organisms life is more important part than their change, or losing some of its parts just to live.Definitely, life is main factor that greatly influenced them to change (a sacrificial change maybe, in human perception).And how does it influence the way organisms change?

"Things don't die on purpose. You had to study that; hun? I mean, it's your prime mechanism. It really needs to have a bit more lan vital if it's not to just sort of a D'ah statement."ANSWER: Correct. Things or living organism don't die on purpose. They don't live too without purpose. That is what I've found in my experiments and my theory. Therefore, natural selection that has no meaning to live and no meaning to preserve life is false, incorrect, inhumane and unscientific.

ANSWER: Oh that is pretty simple. If we will be using just only the natural selection to explain in TOE, then, maybe you are correct. But in real life, if you will dig further into the real world of organisms, there is another mechanism that limit its change. And in my theory, it is called the maturity sequence mechanism, MSM. In short, eventhough one species have million of years chances to change, this organism will never pass and cannot pass the maturity sequence limit of their change as set by natural process, or they will surely die. Or species A will be species A, sometimes A00001, or A21547 or A369874...but it will be still A eventhough they will have a million years. It simply means, further, that offspring of that species will be the same species with the parents. ANSWER; Yes, we've found all evidences. But as I had told you, that evidences in TOE were just in lined according to natural selection. We had many mechanisms in the real world to be considered as I had told you in the preservation of life. But TOE had ignored them or undiscovered them. Reason? One mechanism is probably easy for them to explain. ANSWER: We see it in nature that modification passed in the offspring BUT it is limited modification. We need to consider many mechanisms that govern those oganisms' life and change process. We cannot simply ignored those other mechanisms and say, "Hey, here is the conclusion. Oh leave the other mechanisms, this is enough!". We cannot do that! If we would like to go to Mars, we need to consider many mechanisms and hurdles to know them or our austronauts will die! ANSWER: First, monkeys don't learn to have red hairs. Since we knew that those red-hairs monkeys are still alive and did not die, then, the APM mechanism states that the CIO had given preset information for the appearance of those red hairs to the monkeys.That if the condition will be like is, then, the DNA or gene will act like this, and the outcome will be like this, is the APM mechanism.I called it in my theory the permissible interrelated change or allowable change just to preserve the life of that species.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.

Okay, thanks...

Not actually, since the scientific journal that I've submitted my article for peer review had sent me e-mail that I need to send the complete manuscript. So since I had alreaday sent the manuscript, then, I had to confirm them the e-mail. For the sake of that journal, since I've promised before I submitted my work that my theory is novel, I temporarily deleted all files from my web site.Now, you can see it again.

Yeah, I've alreday proved it in my theory. It says that all living organisms protect their life when threatened for termination, that means, it s observable that their life has a meaning to them to live. For if not, they will be very happy to die. Yeah.Here are theyExperiments:
Experiment in plant.Take for example, two grains or seeds of mongo beans (Phaseolus aureus) . Put one seed of bean in a jar/or garden jar filled with soil (and plant the mongo bean on soil) and put it under the shade or have no sunlight. Or put it inside the closet. Let us call this jar, Pinoy 1.And do the same with the other jar. Let us call this other jar, Pinoy 2. Put Pinoy 2 in direct sunlight. Leave it for seven days. Everyday, put a little water on it to grow.While leaving the two jars, put small amount of water to grow. Leave the twe jars in seven days and you will see that Pinoy 1 had a longer stem than Pinoy 2. That means, Pinoy 1, just to preserve its life, is elongating its stem looking for a way to find sunlight. Pinoy 1 is following the biotic presrvation mechanism that I am saying.Experiment in Living Animal
Prepare one house rat or mouse and put it in a small carton box, 30 cm x 50 cm x H= 50 cm will do. Before you put the rat in that box, put 2 sheets of old newspaper as mat for the rat. But don't give it a chance to escape. Then, give the rat food to eat like cheese. Do it everyday in three consecutive days. And give this rat water too. Then, look and observe how it behaves. Do it in three days and observe for three days. The rat will be just fine though it looks scary.
After three days, threat it to kill the rat. Literally, hit it with a stick. Now, look at how this rat responses. This rat is looking for cover to hide. This rat is looking for way to live by changing its body size to smaller size to fit any holes or openings.Results
Experiment in Plant
By this simple experiment, the jar, named as Pinoy 1, had a longer stem than the jar, named as Pinoy 2, which put in direct sunlight.Experiment in Animal
The result in this simple experiment is that this rat is changing its body size to fit any holes or openings for cover, just to save its life.Conclusion
Both results in the animal's and plant's experiment tell me that the reason why those living organisms are changing is that they are following the interrelation process, by the mechanism of biotic preservation mechanism. And it is not evolution process by natural selection.

No, my theory predicts that we can know the common interelated originator CIO (or origin of life) if we will be using my theory. This CIO maybe alien, or nature or God. Probably, God or alien since nature is no use in explaining the preservation of life of organisms.Yeah, English is my 3rd language.

First, diversity of organisms did not come from natural selection since the other mechanism in nature limits this diversification.Second, interrelation theory states that the appearance of different kinds of organisms and the appearance of diversities of organisms were the result of the interrelated action between the CIO and the timing of the earth to nature.I mean, the CIO, the giver of life, had specifically designed and put all living organisms in the designated geological era (that we knew so far) and interrelated those new organisms on the conditions and surroundings best suited for those organisms.

Yes, I provide to you an evidence of the claim that in the preservation of life,
the best and most logical mechanism is the biotic preservation mechanism since this is what
we've been seeing in nature. It is not natural selection.I don't prove my theory based on my theory. That is TOE not Interrelation Theory.
My theory was rooted on the evidence that I've gathered of the experiments that Ive made.
Anybody can check it. It is n nature, besides, it is very simple.
Of course, if you would like to ignore it, fine. But my evidence is testable and
observable. Yeah, it is laughable. I also laughed at the conclusion of TOE but I don't
blame those scientists or proponents of TOE. It's part of life. Yes, I did it with purpose. Since I believe that Interrelation Theory will surely
topple TOE, then, I had to prepare any simple experiments for all students
so that they could understand fully the important of life in Interrelation Theory.
Since in TOE, life has no important at all, then, TOE doesn't care about this topic.
But in Interrelaton Theory and in nature as we see it, life is very important.Yes, you will surely ignore the mechanism of biotic preservation mechanism (BPM),
I don't care. But even so, the fact that we see it in nature and it is natural
and testable is there. And this fact will never change whether you like it or not.And this is the reason why I am surprised to see that TOE had a very limited mechanisms to
explain the complexities of life. TOE should dig further and they could find
this mechanism. But sad to say, TOE could not find it. Well, I can do satirical post too to TOE. But being a professional who valued life the most
after I found the Interrelation Theory than TOE, I'd rather waste my time
thinking on how to help the human lives by giving them the most logical theory
of human origin and their reason to preserve life. First, I don't tailored it. You observed facts and evidences. You make theory so that
you could use it for prediction and guide for further
study to the facts that you've been seeing. That is science.
I've been seeing and witnessing
biotic preservaton mechanism since I was a child, even before I went to school to
study biology. Since I've always done those simple experiments to many animals
that I've encountered to see how they behaved in their life.
And one conclusion had only been around:
organisms change or interrelate by the mechanism of biotic preservaton and
not natural selection. Nailing the TOE on its own coffin. Assuming that the rat in your experiment did not eat the cheese, but the result will
be the same in the experiment. Rat will change not because of natural selection,
but by biotic preservation mechanism. You can test it many times and you will get the same results. Yes, I did that experiments in my lifetime for maybe 5 or more times in rats. But some
settings were different. Rats were pests in my place, so we need to literally take them
out from our closets and kitchens, backyards. And sometimes we needed to use sticks
to bring them out. And the results are the same: rats will change not
becuase of natural selection but because of biotic preservation.I did that experiments too to frogs, fishes, dogs, cats, chickens, crabs...
many animals to find out the same result.
That is the reason why I knew that Darwin and TOE proponents are wrong in their mechanism.The reason why I used rat in my experiment in my web site was that since I believe that
many laboratories are using rats and mice. If they wanted to do some experiment, then,
they could use that specimen for test. No sweat, just use the available items. TOE knew it maybe but TOE did not know the mechanism that work on why
plants and animals attempt to stay alive! Me too! I did not know it
until I discovered Interrelation Theory!And the worst part of TOE is that TOE is using the wrong mechanism, i.e.
natural selection in this important natural event of the living organisms!
Wrong mechanism means wrong explanation, wrong explanation means wrong theory,
therefore TOE is wrong! We need to use that mechanism in that event since we are talking about biology
and the life of organisms on how they change (interrelate) just to preseve life.
That is biology....we don't study dead rocks! We study life forms and organisms. Good question. We know it by test and experiment. In this, I've proved that I'm right. We don't know yet if life of an organism is an instict one. Behavior is an instict
but we don't know about life if it is instinct. And behavior must have source to
behave or it will never behave at all. In the living organisms, the source of this
behavior is the biotic preservation mechanism. The follow-up question will be: why animals
have that instinct to live? In my Interrelation Theory, the cause of life is the common interrelated originator (CIO) since
before this organisms must form on earth, this CIO must already been existing or
there will be no organisms at all. It is the difference in mechanism use in both theories. In TOE, to preserve life,
you will use natural selection. But in Interrelation Theory, to preserve life, it uses
biotic preservation mechanism with clarification. But if we study in whole both theories,
TOE is an incomplete since TOE had neglected time mechanism (MSM in Interrelation),
behavioral mechanism (BPM in Interrelation), properties mechanism (APM in Interrelation)
and population mechanism (LCM in Interrelation) that we are seeing in nature.The incompleteness of TOE to explain the diversities and complexities of life
proves that TOE's explanation is incorrect, therefore TOE is not correct in scientific
explanation, therefore TOE must be uprooted or replaced in science. I am the discoverer of this new theory and new mechanisms, so I think it is my right
to use the best suitable words or terms for this theory.
Since you did not yet read all the explanation in my web site, then, you will surely
never know what is Interrelaton Theory. I don't blame you.
Or probably, you will just ignore it. It is OK for me.Even so, the fact in nature will never change. It is Interrelaton Theory or nothing. I understand TOE for if I don't, I will never have a nerve to fight TOE in head to head,
in natural explanation clashing with natural explanation battle in science.
Why should I waste my time depending a loser theory?
I can and I know what is TOE's weaknesses and errors. TOE is man-made, therefore,
it is not perfect. Of course, I am not a perfect too. BUT TOE is incomplete as
compared to Interrelation Theory.Okay, I knew that population evolve accdg to TOE. But TOE had no mechanism in population,
to support that claim from TOE. In Interrelaton Theory, it had and it is just the opposite
of TOE. It is called the Lineage Continuaton Mechanism (LCM).
It is very observable in nature!And the worst case for TOE is that it had no mechanism for time. that supposed to be
"evolution is change in time!". But in Interrelation Theory, the "time" that TOE had been
depending upon for evolution (evolution and the end-product is new species)to occur,
time itself is aginst TOE! It is very observable in nature!I was really surprised too that when I've discovered these mechanisms,
TOE did not know them! TOE is seeing a square object. But in reality,
it is a cube. And that is Interelation Theory.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.

Time mechanism actually limits or kills diversification. That means, time kills TOE.
TOE must deliberately ignore time mechanism and avoid it so that evolution with respect
to time must be true. Actually TOE is doing it right now. Well, it is true until
Interrelation Theory found out the time mechanism in nature. Since nature has time,
it must not be deliberately forgotten.The changes that we are seeing in all species are best explained as permissible
interrelated changes (PIC). Diversification is caused by interrelation, and the
changes are very limited. In Interrelation Theory, it is called allowable changes for
all organisms to preserve life. I understand it. But you don't understand. Since TOE had deliberately neglected or
undiscovered or ignored time mechanism (and other mechanisms) in nature, you will simply
arrive in the same conclusion with TOE. Incorrect conclusion by using
incomplete mechanisms, that result in incorrect theory.Explanation in nature must be "cube", but since TOE had been neglecting and
deliberateley ignoring time mechanisms and etc as describe in Interrelation Theory that are
observable in nature, then, the picture that TOE is presenting is "square".Now square is totally different from cube! Did you get me? Since time mechanism limits the change and kills TOE, then, the process
of evolution by natural selection is also dead. It is impossible to happen.So the best and most plausible explanation for the diversification and the origin
of new organisms/species is the gradual appearance of all new organisms by the process
of interrelation by CIO. Why gradual? Since the earth changes gradually. So the designed
and properties of that oganisms that who must live on that time/era must be interrelated to
that era, and interrelated to the former organisms and interrelated to the CIO.
Of course, it is not nature since natural selection is already falsified.That means, we will find similarities of species/organisms
in the same geological era as we are looking now in the so called Tree of Life.
It should be called now, the Tree of Interrelation of Organisms. No, designated geological era is not constant. This is fact. I accept it.
I did not say that it is not gradual. If the earth changes gradually, then, all organisms
that should appear must interrelate with it. This is Interelation Theory.
The CIO knew that the earth is gradually changing, so the observable 4 mechanisms
in Interrelation Theory must work hand in hand to preserve the life of all
organisms on gradually changing earth. This is Interelation Theory. (i)
And that is what we are looking in nature.But the change is limited as I had stated above. I agree. That is why I am asking you to replace TOE now with Interrelation Theory.

I am just telling the world that Interrelation Theory is better than TOE. And it happens that TOE is incomplete.I've been reading TalkOrigins 9 years ago. But I am not convinced since observable and testable facts in nature are telling different things.