Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Macroevolution: Its all around us...
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 306 (204780)
05-03-2005 8:30 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by eclipse
05-03-2005 4:28 PM


quote:
We are man kind and monkeys are monkey kind
Is Homo erectus man kind, monkey kind or Homo erectus kind? What are Australopithecines?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by eclipse, posted 05-03-2005 4:28 PM eclipse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by eclipse, posted 05-04-2005 10:21 PM Funkaloyd has not replied

Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 306 (205753)
05-06-2005 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by eclipse
05-06-2005 2:04 PM


quote:
It looked to me like you were talking about micro-evolution, which I agree with because it proven and observable, and calling it macro-evolution, which is not.
Most people―including other creationists―consider macroevolution to be speciation and above (through to the Kingdom level). Some definitions from around the web.
quote:
it would seem that creating a new fish wouldn't claim anything for macro-evolution unless it formed legs.
A Schindleria brevipinguis can evolve into a whale shark, but a mudskipper can't evolve into a salamander-like amphibian?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by eclipse, posted 05-06-2005 2:04 PM eclipse has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024