Some Evidence Against Evolution

SonicAn excerpt from your post pretty much hits the nail on the head.

Well logidemic must be well hidden as it does not appear in the national cancer institute advanced search engine in the U.S. nor the cross cancer institute here in Alberta.Can you give us a reference to where you found this word Willowtree?

This will be the 17th post since Willowtree last posted. Can I assume he/she has given up trying to impress us with jargon that has no reference in any check throughout the entire web? I believe that they are trying to get some kind of handle on how to approach the level of understanding of evolution that this site has to offer. I am of the distinct impression that they have never had to put this level of effort into arguing their stance on the issue.
I do hope they are able to allow their ego to relax enough that they do not miss the chance to learn new things while at the same time maybe to let go of what they had been led to believe were the facts.

Wow what a difference a few minutes make.Welcome back.

Willowtree.It appears that the thorn in your ass happens to be that people do not acknowledge and worship yourconception of God. You obviously consider us to be cretins just because we do not share your beliefs. Why are you such a hard ass about this and what gives you the right to judge our motives when we defend the evidence that stands available?You have a problem with the level of "jargon" that is used by evolutionists and no doubt you are justified to some degree yet the world cannot simply stop to make every nuance acceptable to your needs. Do you complain as loudly when doctors speak of conditions of the body that are obscure? Do you fret that your mechanic could twist your mind in to a pretzel babbling about all the technical terms at their command? In the mind numbingly simple trade I work in [waterproofing] we have items that we use that would leave you scratching your head but are simple to me because I deal with them on a day to day basis.The only reason you are pissed off is because you percieve a threat to your world view.Well that is your problem.Perhaps you should question a world view that is so easily attacked by science. As I am slowly learning [to my immense regret] science is not hard but it is subtle and it quite often fun. Again you are assuming that we are closed minded. This is most certainly not the case but it will take a lot more than you merely dropping names to bolster your position. PH.D's are not what decides the issue it is the quality of the arguement put forth to explain the evidence and more importantly the evidence itself. If you think it harsh that we do not simply drop to our knees in supplication to God because it is your belief that we are simply in denial shows that you know less about you fellow man and the people at this site than you do about science in general and evolution in particular.I do hope you can bring more to the table than simply names.------------------
"Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it."[This message has been edited by sidelined, 12-10-2003][This message has been edited by sidelined, 12-10-2003][This message has been edited by sidelined, 12-10-2003]

Willowtree
Dr. Gene Scott earned his Ph.D. in Philosophies of Education is what we get from his website. Unfortunately there is no way to get ahold of him as he is an apparently busy man.If you would be so kind as to reference the item of his where you found this logidemic word.

Willowtree I will bet you money that this word is an invention of his plain and simple. No doubt he used it in some context that allowed him to impress others. Like the saying goes, if you can't dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with bullshit.

wjI wonder if there is a special interpretation inherent in the quotation marks around scientific. Perhaps we are not going to recieve evidence but rather some vague philosophical arguement that Willowtree finds impressive.

You know, I do believe, Willowtree, you do not know me well enough to make these statements simply because I interfere with your hero-worship. Please do not forget that opinions and assholes are available to everyone. I have yet to figure out which one you are presenting here.In the interest of objectivity I have taken the liberty of contacting Stanford university that I may learn more about the claims made by Dr. Gene Scott. I should recieve a reply next week so I will post any response that I receive to this E-mail.If you ever get around to actually presenting any evidence that is of a scientific nature I will be pleasantly surprised.As to your postings above it is easy to be brave from a distance isn't it?[This message has been edited by sidelined, 12-12-2003]

WillowtreeHow about taking your inteeligent designer mind to this website and have a read; Not Found (404) | IT ServicesYours Truly Moron Punk