Some Evidence Against Evolution

Ok people I'm tired of this, a theory as defined by science is an explanation of an observation that has yet to be disproved. Some of the hardcore science guys can explain it better, but the point is that a scientific theory isn't just an "educated guess". Please keep this in mind when posting.

Willowtree!Stop babbling about punishments from god and provide evidence that Evolution is incorrect and that creationism is correct. That is the purpose of this thread and you have yet to provide the evidence needed to support your claims.Either do so now or accept that you have no evidence against evolution.BTW assertions mean nothing until you back them up with evidence.

Willotree, We're still waiting for the scientific evidence please post it soon, you can glorify Scott later.BTW Unless Scott is around 100 years old I doubt that he as read every book relating to the subject. Also I have yet to hear the voice of Scott so I doubt that he is

Willowtree,Evolution has absolutely nothing to do with the creation of life. Evolution explains what happens after life has been formed. I repeat, evolution is not about the beginning of life. That being said I see no reason why you have to conclude that god and evolution aren't compatible.Now if I understand you correctly you are saying that any part of science that doesn't start with the assumption that god is exists is biased and part of this "scientism". But, if that is true then pretty much all of science would be as you say "scientism".Which god(s) should the scientist assume exists? Is it still science if the scientist believes in say Allah? Can something only be by your definition "true science" if those involved believe in the christian god?If this is truly what you believe are you really willing to classify "creation science" as the only true unbiased science?