The page to which I linked is a list of the common arguments used to try to refute the theory of evolution. Most of those arguments are attempts to use science and mathematics to refute the theory of evolution. Sorry if you're not interested in looking at that page very closely -- probably similar to how I feel about looking into Sutcliff's book.
People come in here all the time claiming that they (or their favorite author) has disproven the theory of evolution once and for all. So far, they have all failed. I just don't have enough time to read every single book that someone suggests. They have to convince me that it is worth my while. So far, I see nothing that suggests that Sutcliff isn't just repeating the same tired old arguments that everyone has already seen before.
Like PaulK, I would like to see whether Sutcliff really does have a good argument. I doubt it, but that is where you can make a difference. Start a thread on what you think is Sutcliff's best argument.
Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. --
Charley the Australopithecine
™ Version 4.2