Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Evolution is a Fraud
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 59 of 72 (402026)
05-23-2007 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Evolution Crusher
05-22-2007 6:47 PM


Monkeys apply for research grant.
Sutcliff cites a recent BBC article where students at a UK university tried to put the famous typing monkey theory into practice. Needless to say, the monkeys did not type anything that even remotely resembled Shakespear as Hardison predicted. They did not even type a legible word in English. However, the monkeys did succeed in using the computers as toilets.
This is utter nonsense. Monkeys typing on typewriters has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution. The monkeys actions (or lack of actions) do however disprove Einstein's theory of relativity. Sutcliff is just confused over which theory he has found to be fraudulent.
The latest news from that UK university is of interest. A university Ethics Review Board is investigating allegations that it was the students who defecated on the typewriters, and the monkeys who wrote the journal article about the experiment. They were alerted to this situation when it was noticed that the three lead authors of the article were named Bozo, Chuckles, and Curious George.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Evolution Crusher, posted 05-22-2007 6:47 PM Evolution Crusher has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 62 of 72 (402031)
05-23-2007 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Zhimbo
05-22-2007 9:09 PM


Re: For those interested in the monkey "experiment"
This is really disheartening. Just when we thought that Evolution Crusher was the dumbest monkey on the planet, along comes this report:
Paignton Zoo scientific officer Dr Amy Plowman said: "The work was interesting but had little scientific value, except to show that the 'infinite monkey' theory is flawed."
Doesn't Dr. Amy know that it takes a minimum of 27 monkeys to approximate an infinite population? What university has a doctorate program in shit shoveling? And why is the random typing of A, J, L, and M considered an improvement over typing straight S's? It is gratifying, though, to know that the 2,000 pounds wasn't wasted.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Zhimbo, posted 05-22-2007 9:09 PM Zhimbo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024