Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The bible and homosexuality: Round 3
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 241 of 306 (159189)
11-13-2004 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by Rrhain
11-13-2004 4:03 PM


Re: Please
Go back and read all my posts on this subject. If you still don't get it, I can't help you.
You either get it, and are just being a pain, and actually playing a game of insincere word twisting. Or you don't get it and are stupid?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Rrhain, posted 11-13-2004 4:03 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by Rrhain, posted 11-14-2004 5:09 AM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 244 of 306 (159193)
11-13-2004 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by Rrhain
11-13-2004 4:16 PM


Re: Please
Thats awesome rhain, you've repeated yourself for the 1000th time.
Tell him what hes won Johnny!
So tell me, did you figure all that out on your calculator?
Go back and answer your own questions, I told you, I'm through with you, you are dishonest, insulting, and a liar. You even admitted it.
Stop wasting our time, life is too short.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by Rrhain, posted 11-13-2004 4:16 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by AdminNosy, posted 11-13-2004 8:15 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 269 by Rrhain, posted 11-14-2004 5:21 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 247 of 306 (159198)
11-13-2004 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 231 by The Dread Dormammu
11-13-2004 6:22 PM


Re: P.S.
Thanks Dread, and welcome to the forum. You can choose to ignore rhain at any given moment. He only picks on me because I am Christian.
Let me set a few things straight, and you can go back and read my posts. Only rhain would twist them around to make them sound otherwise. His logic is, that If I do not agree with Homosexuality, then I hate homo's.
Rape=bad
Homosexuality= I am no better than a homosexual. We all sin. If you commit one, you have commited them all. I do not hate Homosexual people, the person themselves, but I do not agree with the act. I do not agree with any sin, and would do whatever it takes to discourage it. With myself or with others. I will however not judge a person by his/her actions, I am in no position to do such. No matter what rhain thinks, I will not do that.
If I point something out in the bible that is against God, I am not condemming anyone. I profess that I am no better than that person. But that does not mean, that we cannot point these things out to each other.
So tell me, if you found out your wife enjoyed her being raped, what would you do? Truthfully.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 11-13-2004 6:22 PM The Dread Dormammu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 11-14-2004 5:52 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 248 of 306 (159203)
11-13-2004 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 237 by pink sasquatch
11-13-2004 7:29 PM


Re: Please
You too, need to put your train of thought back a couple thousand yearsm so that you could understand the statement.
All the verse is trying to say is, if you enjoy the rape, then you are really cheating, and you get stoned.
Forget all what you said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 7:29 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 8:35 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 260 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 9:15 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 249 of 306 (159206)
11-13-2004 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 238 by happy_atheist
11-13-2004 7:55 PM


Re: Please
It's ludicrous to suggest that not screaming equals consent and enjoyment.
Yes it is ludicrous, good thing I am not doing that.
Please tell me how you'd tell the difference between "not screaming because you love it" and "not screaming out of fear"?
I don't know, step inside my time machine and lets attempt to find out.
Its the year 600BC, and we are living in tents
(or we are sleeping on the desert floor). There are no cars honking, no TV, no noise of any type. We are living in a gun free community, were if a pin drops everyone will hear it. A woman screams rape in the middle of night. What should we do?
Is this helping you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by happy_atheist, posted 11-13-2004 7:55 PM happy_atheist has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 250 of 306 (159207)
11-13-2004 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by pink sasquatch
11-13-2004 8:06 PM


Re: Please
You can compare them both, because they are both rules set forth by the Bible (and the same chapter I believe)...
Why do you follow one rule but not the other?
I follow the moral of both. You are just not getting the moral, but I'm sure you follow it too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 8:06 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 251 of 306 (159208)
11-13-2004 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by happy_atheist
11-13-2004 8:06 PM


Re: Please
Can you tell me the moral of homosexuality?
Now tell me the literal meaning of homosexuality.
Go ahead.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by happy_atheist, posted 11-13-2004 8:06 PM happy_atheist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by happy_atheist, posted 11-13-2004 9:01 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 253 of 306 (159213)
11-13-2004 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by lfen
11-13-2004 8:10 PM


Re: Please
What the Bible seems to say is that a woman must scream or face the death penalty.
No, that is not what they are saying, not at all.
Should a woman scream if she knew in a heartbeat she would be saved?
If there is someone around to hear her screams and ave her, shouldn't she indeed scream?
If no-one is around to hear her scream, then whos going to stone her? Who's going to prove that she didn't scream? Its her word against her rapists.
Why is everyone missing the point? Is the world that screwd up, that we can't understand a simple moral, even though we follow that moral today? Why do I get called dumb for being the only one who understands this moral?
I understand you want to believe you have a book from God and that God is good and so everything in the book is true. This is embracing childish nonsense and supersition and leads you into all sorts of silly rationalizations. Grow up, start thinking and studying the world, history, science and realize that the fundamentalist inerrant position is childish, stupid, wrong, and leads to the kinds of tortured illogical things that you are posting in this thread.
Wow dude, just wow.
You think for one second that I am so stupid, that I fell for all that crap in the bible? You think it is all non-sense?
I say that you are the one that needs to look at the world around you. Keep looking.
When you are on your death bed, lets see what you think then.
Matthew 22:14
"For many are invited, but few are chosen."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 8:10 PM lfen has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 255 of 306 (159216)
11-13-2004 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 246 by AdminNosy
11-13-2004 8:15 PM


Re: Lying?
It looks from the outside like he's tied you into logical knots and you don't like it.
Its anything but logical.
He is a liar, and he admits it. He has also accused me of lying, with no proof, only speculation. I have chosen to not respond to his posts anymore, because they are the farthest thing from intelligent conversation. I have a life, and I have donated enough time to his side of the arguement on this subject.
I think he just cut and pasted his response from round 1 of this thread.
He only keeps accusing me of bad things, that are simply not true. When does it end?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by AdminNosy, posted 11-13-2004 8:15 PM AdminNosy has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 256 of 306 (159217)
11-13-2004 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by lfen
11-13-2004 8:35 PM


Re: Please
Again you twist it up real good, and your peanut gallery urges you on. I bet you feel great.
If you go back and read ALL my posts, you can see how we still "stone" people who cheat on their spouses today.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 8:35 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 9:06 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 259 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 9:14 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 261 of 306 (159241)
11-13-2004 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by happy_atheist
11-13-2004 9:01 PM


Re: Please
Right, the moral and the act is the same thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by happy_atheist, posted 11-13-2004 9:01 PM happy_atheist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 271 by happy_atheist, posted 11-14-2004 8:47 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 262 of 306 (159242)
11-13-2004 10:49 PM
Reply to: Message 258 by lfen
11-13-2004 9:06 PM


Re: Please
You agreed with me, once you fully understand what I was saying.
So how is it rubbing your face?
Or you just don't like when your feathers are ruffled, or or you don't like to ruffle anyones feathers, or you have not ruffled anyones feathers, or you would have not ever ruffled anyones feathers?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 9:06 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 273 by lfen, posted 11-14-2004 4:34 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 263 of 306 (159248)
11-13-2004 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by lfen
11-13-2004 9:14 PM


Re: Please
Where does it say stoned to death?
I speak from experience when I say I would rather recieve a stoning, than suffer the rest of my life without knowing my daughter, that my ex-girlfriend has brainwashed to hate me. She hates me, and doesn't even know me. That hurts more than any stupid stoning. Years of pain and suffering. It still hurts even though I am now free of the anger, because I forgive her, even though she still does it to me.
There were times even that I would have prefered to be stoned to death.
Maybe life was so screwd up back then, and people were so corrupt, that the only way to keep them in line was to stone to death. But I was not under the impression that the woman was stoned to death, I would hope not.
To me the moral of the story is, that if your woman cheats on you, she is wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by lfen, posted 11-13-2004 9:14 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by lfen, posted 11-14-2004 4:51 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 264 of 306 (159250)
11-13-2004 11:13 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by pink sasquatch
11-13-2004 9:15 PM


Re: Please
Based on your above comments, it seems that you have knowledge that a couple thousand years ago, all women that were silent during a rape were enjoying it. What was essentially different about women a few thousand years ago that none of them would retreat into silence rather than cry out?
I believe I have addressed that already, and you are still taking it wrong.
with stones that they die;
So they did stone them to death, both of them.
Pretty strick uh? Pretty severe too. Thank God he sent his son to forgive us of our sins now.
So if the woman enjoys it, she gets stoned to death.
If the man does it he gets stoned to death.
I know men today that would kill their wives if they caught them cheating, and the man too.
I also know women that would love to see their rapiest die.
So then I ask, why is this so harsh that these same thoughts and principals are in the bible? what is the real difference?
Isn't it almost as painfull for all those involved when a woman cheats, or a man rapes, as death? This must have been the best solution for the time.
I also look at it like if I was a woman. Lets see, I am getting raped. If I scream, my attacker my kill me, if I don't I will get stoned to death. If I scream, I might get saved also. think think think..AHHHHH!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 9:15 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 265 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 11:38 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 272 by happy_atheist, posted 11-14-2004 9:02 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 445 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 266 of 306 (159268)
11-14-2004 1:25 AM
Reply to: Message 265 by pink sasquatch
11-13-2004 11:38 PM


Re: Please
They're still harsh now. And there is a real difference between killing an attacker and killing a victim.
Yes, I totally agree with you, but if you have been listening to me, I am saying that what I think the bible is implying about a woman not screaming, is like saying she is not really a victim.
Just because people want these things to happen, does not make them correct. Indeed it is illegal to kill your partner for cheating or to kill your rapist after-the-fact.
Of course it is. If we did, then everyone would be dead now, wouldn't they. Well almost everyone. You see how they glorify cheating on TV these days? Its an awesome world humanism has created isn't it?
Is cheating or rape worse than death? No.
Thats not what I said. I said being raped, or being cheated on ain't no picnic. Some even kill themselves over it, because death is preferable.
If you were being raped, would you think so logically while being violently violated? I doubt it.
Your right, I would probably just scream.
And now for the complete verse in context, because you guys have been mixing up verses.
quote:
22 If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel.
That is one thought.
Then it goes on to:
quote:
23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death-the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man's wife. You must purge the evil from among you.
quote:
25 But if out in the country a man happens to meet a girl pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die. 26 Do nothing to the girl; she has committed no sin deserving death. This case is like that of someone who attacks and murders his neighbor, 27 for the man found the girl out in the country, and though the betrothed girl screamed, there was no one to rescue her.
So after have read those 3, it makes a little more sense, FOR THE TIME. Not today. The morals there are still in effect today.
Now for the tough one:
quote:
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [3] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
I will admit that this is a crazy verse. But for the time, it may have been needed. It was what Moses made as law, because he saw that it would work for the mindset of the people at that time. You cannot change the minds of people that easy, that is apparent in this forum.
If a woman was violated, she would not be a virgin anymore. This back then was everything to a woman, and the community. If she married and they found out she wasn't a virgin, they would kill her. So once she got raped, that guy who did it, better love her, because he is now out 50 shekels, and has to support her for the rest of his life. I don't feel as though this law was written to degrade woman, as much as it was written to deter men from doing such an act.
Now we have a hard time understanding it, because things are way different. Our culture is based on our needs for the time. 2000 years from now, we might look back and say how silly our laws are right now. There are plenty of stupid laws on the books right now. One of them being killing someone who tresspasses into your house, and you go to jail for killing him, and defending your home, just because he didn't have a gun or something stupid like that. Just look at the OJ fiasco, tell me that wasn't our Law in all its glory. We actually pay people to lie for us, so we can get away with murder, and all though this is not leagal when worded like that, it happens everyday, and it is widely accepted. So the law says one thing, yet we do another.
A quote from a commentary:
Commentaries:
Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
<< Previous verse Next verse >>
Deuteronomy 22:13-30
If a man take a wife, etc.--The regulations that follow might be imperatively needful in the then situation of the Israelites; and yet, it is not necessary that we should curiously and impertinently inquire into them. So far was it from being unworthy of God to leave such things upon record, that the enactments must heighten our admiration of His wisdom and goodness in the management of a people so perverse and so given to irregular passions. Nor is it a better argument that the Scriptures were not written by inspiration of God to object that this passage, and others of a like nature, tend to corrupt the imagination and will be abused by evil-disposed readers, than it is to say that the sun was not created by God, because its light may be abused by wicked men as an assistant in committing crimes which they have meditated [HORNE].
Matthew Henrey comments:
Deuteronomy 22:1-30
Of humanity towards brethren. (1-4) Various precepts. (5-12) Against impurity. (13-30)
Verses 1-4 If we duly regard the golden rule of "doing to others as we would they should do unto us," many particular precepts might be omitted. We can have no property in any thing that we find. Religion teaches us to be neighbourly, and to be ready to do all good offices to all men. We know not how soon we may have occasion for help.
Verses 5-12 God's providence extends itself to the smallest affairs, and his precepts do so, that even in them we may be in the fear of the Lord, as we are under his eye and care. Yet the tendency of these laws, which seem little, is such, that being found among the things of God's law, they are to be accounted great things. If we would prove ourselves to be God's people, we must have respect to his will and to his glory, and not to the vain fashions of the world. Even in putting on our garments, as in eating or in drinking, all must be done with a serious regard to preserve our own and others' purity in heart and actions. Our eye should be single, our heart simple, and our behaviour all of a piece.
Verses 13-30 These and the like regulations might be needful then, and yet it is not necessary that we should curiously examine respecting them. The laws relate to the seventh commandment, laying a restraint upon fleshly lusts which war against the soul.
I think all of those laws were geared towards keeping the woman pure, and keeping the man from making her unpure, just to satisfy his needs of the flesh.
Woman back then were for the taking, thats just the way it was. There were no guns, no midget lawers, and the rule of the land was a strong hand. you didn't survive on this earth unless you were strong enough too.
If we took everyone here on this forum, and stuck them on a deserted island, never to be seen again by society, some of the rules might change in respect to how we live. The stronger ones would have more say, or the majority would rule, unless the strongest person decided to kick everyones ass. Thats just the way it is, you can't change that. That person too, would also be able to take a woman if he wanted to. Whats to stop him? It grows from there. We would then have our own set of rules, based on our situation, and who was there, so we could survive. These rules would be completely out of line with the rest of society.
You want to dis-regard a book, that is so filled with information that can help you, with so much love and peace, because you can't relate to the times. You then call it evil, and dismiss it.
But I bet you, there are parts of the world that you would have no trouble visiting, and cherish your visit, even though some of there rules do not conform to your way of thinking. you would never call them evil. you would just accept them as being from a different culture, and have there own set of rules based on their situation and surroundings, and their history.
I will admit to you, as I have before to others here, I have not even read the whole OT. It is not even necessary to get to know God. The most important thing is knowing Jesus's words. I don't think I have ever seen someone in here dispute his words. It was his walk with faith, and by his example we are to follow. He promised us all of those things that he did, and greater, if we could just walk the walk.
I see it happening in my life.
This is also why, I do not get so hung up on whether Homosexuality is right or wrong, with the bible. It is very clear in there that it was against the bible, and Jesus "didn't come to change the law". Regardless of all that, I do not feel it is right, and when I ask God, he does not give me the feeling that it is right, but that I am not to judge those who do it, but to pray for them. I also won't be the one sitting in heaven saying "I told you so". Everyone is were their at for a reason. I fully understand that.
If your a gay person and looking for someone who doesn't think its right to sit here and say, yea its ok, I don't think thats going to happen either.
Now if we want to rationalize everything like Yaro tried to do by saying:
You seem to be supporting the OT, rape and all, by simply saying "things were different back then so it was ok". Since that is the case, why can't I simply say "Things are different now, so homosexuality is ok"?
Yes we can say that the times have changed, and our culture has changed. Even Jesus has helped to change the way we think. He is the main reason why we have changed so much. But the morals remain. Is she saying Jesus came down and said "Homosexuality is ok"?
Its all BS. The way things are today rape happens all the time. Our society is brainwashed into thinking that having sex is the thing to do, and relationships are out the window. I know not all people are like this, but have you watch TV lately. I am disgusted at how our nation is behaving. When I was younger, I couldn't even see it, because I to was brain washed to flow right along with it. Guys lie to girls, and tell them they love them just to get in their pants. To me thats a form of rape. Maybe the girl enjoyed it for the monent, but she lives with the pain and anguish of being lied to for the rest of her life. She then makes an oath to herself to never let that happen again, and then the next guy that comes along gets to deal with all that pain.
Give me a break.
8 All things are wearisome,
more than one can say.
The eye never has enough of seeing,
nor the ear its fill of hearing.
9 What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.
10 Is there anything of which one can say,
"Look! This is something new"?
It was here already, long ago;
it was here before our time.
Its all BS. Anyone who professes to know the answers is full of it, unless they now the truth, the only truth, and thats God, he's the only truth. You know, the one in your heart. The true person you are. You know, you without all the BS.
How do you find him? One way is through the bible, you know that evil book with all those crazy stories from a time we know little about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 265 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 11:38 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-14-2004 2:22 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 275 by lfen, posted 11-14-2004 5:21 PM riVeRraT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024