Read all of the posts I composed today. You will see why my reasoning is not circular.
No DNA is not conscious. Yes codes come from conscious minds. DNA was not the encoder. It holds the code.
But, codes denote communication. Period. DNA holds files/specs. Those are photcopied by mRNA and taken to the ribosomes. The photcopies are decoded/read by ribosomes and the ribosomes build the physical reality that the info. stored in DNA represented. The code in DNA that represents an arm is not an arm, it is instructions on how to build an arm. When the specs for an arm are requested, mRNA specifically records specific info on a specific member (the arm) and takes it directly to the ribosome who inturn decodes the info and builds the arm that the code in the DNA specifically represented. Intent. The code was intentionally called for, mRNA intentionally got it and intentionally took it to the ribosome and the ribosome decoded and built the arm that the code specifically instructed.
You haven't shown intent. You assumed it's there. Intent implies a concious mind. But that's the point you are trying to make. therefore your reasoning is circular. Therefore it is fallacious. It is as simple as that.
™ Version 4.2