Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Question about this so called World Wide Flood.
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 12 of 63 (24124)
11-24-2002 8:32 PM


If we really get TC back to this thread, let me note a couple of things that need to be addressed:
- All that water was seawater, or at least seawater with fresh water floating on top, undisturbed and unmixed by those big "flood surges" every few days.
- Soil irrigated for a few years with even mildly brackish water will not grow most crop plants - it accumulates too much salt.
- Coconuts, mangroves, and saltgrass will tolerate seawater, but are not mentioned in Genesis. Grapes won't tolerate seawater. How long after this flood was it that Noah got drunk?
- Think of our invertebrate friends in the sea: only a very few will survive, say, a 20% dilution of seawater with fresh. So while we're keeping the saltwater off our crops, let's keep the rainwater off our reefs.

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by John, posted 12-05-2002 10:01 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 15 of 63 (24128)
11-24-2002 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Chara
11-24-2002 9:37 PM


Over 95% of the water on earth now is in the oceans, with nearly all the rest in icecaps. So even if all the present water were mixed together, it would be nearly as salty as standard seawater. If Noah & Co. had enough fresh water around to make any difference, either 1) the seawater then would have been much saltier than now or 2) some mechanism would have to exist to zap-poof that water away at the end of the Flood. Either seems a pretty big strain.
"after all us creationists don't have any brains and are ignorant - that much I've found out from reading through this forum."
Please don't do that. You have a brain, or you probably wouldn't be here. If you are ignorant, that can be a temporary condition. :-)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Chara, posted 11-24-2002 9:37 PM Chara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Chara, posted 11-24-2002 10:22 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 24 of 63 (24202)
11-25-2002 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Chara
11-24-2002 10:28 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Chara:
Now another question ... supposing (cause I know that this is a hotly debated topic and I don't even know where I stand on it) the hypothesis of an existing canopy of water over the earth collapsed during the flood, would that have necessarily been salt water? and would that have an effect on the salinity (sp?) of the water? Remember: emphasis on supposing
I don't see why a "vapor canopy" wouldn't be fresh, but then I have never seen any plausible explanation as to how one could exist at all. If you had a solid, dome-shaped "firmament," yeah, you might be able to keep some water on top of it, but our moon visits and other space probes would have encountered more problems than they did. And if you did have a huge source of fresh water, you would have killed all the corals and a majority of other sea life, and you still have to make that water go somewhere when the Flood subsides.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Chara, posted 11-24-2002 10:28 PM Chara has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 26 of 63 (24204)
11-25-2002 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Peter
11-25-2002 7:27 AM


quote:
There is no suggestion that the twig came from a live tree,
is there?
If you take the translation to mean an olive branch, with leaves so that it is distinguishable from driftwood, I would think a live tree is called for. A year under seawater would make leaves look pretty funky.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Peter, posted 11-25-2002 7:27 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Peter, posted 11-27-2002 6:24 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 27 of 63 (24205)
11-25-2002 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by funkmasterfreaky
11-25-2002 12:10 AM


quote:
The biblical account of the ark was for simple people by simple people
Indeed. That's why it has all the marks of fable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 12:10 AM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 11-25-2002 12:59 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 56 of 63 (39771)
05-11-2003 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by peanutbean6111
05-11-2003 5:37 PM


Hi, Brianna! How many species of animal do you think there are at present? How many when this ark was built? You can limit your count to those that have nostrils, if you think that's the only sort that Noah needed to shelter.
Quite a few predators will only eat live prey: bats, snakes.... How were they fed?
What does saturation in seawater do the ability of soil to support plant life, particularly crops like barley and wheat? Or olive trees?
How did all those marsupials get to Australia after the flood, with no placental mammals getting mixed in? Did the blind "marsupial moles" (the Notoryctidae) burrow all the way?
Where did Noah find enough eucalyptus leaves to feed the koalas, and enough bamboo to feed the giant pandas, out in Mesopotamia somewhere?
And welcome to C vs E!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by peanutbean6111, posted 05-11-2003 5:37 PM peanutbean6111 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2003 11:31 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 59 of 63 (39780)
05-11-2003 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Buzsaw
05-11-2003 11:31 PM


The Bible indicates that man was a vegetarian before the flood and implies that the animals were also.
Chapter & verse? And how, exactly, did those antediluvian snakes and ticks and lions and leeches chew their food?
Imo, the flood wasn't sea water. Most of the flood waters came from the vapor canopy which condensed and fell to earth. It would have diluted the relatively small bodies of earth water that may have had some salt content.
Where did all this fresh water disappear to? How did it avoid killing all those forms of sealife that must have seawater to live?
The continents wouldn't have divided totally until the frozen Arctic .....
Allowing more time for marsupials to get mixed up with placentals on their way to Oz? This reply doesn't even address the question: Why koalas and bilbies in Australia and nowhere else? Why no cats or rabbits in Australia until Europeans arrived?
terrarium atmosphere canopy indicated then.
If this "canopy" held enough water to fill even half of our present seas, would you care to hear an estimate of what the atmospheric pressure would have been? Would you be interested in knowing what the percentage of oxygen was? Would you like to see a vapor-pressure chart to indicate the temperatures required to keep that water as vapor?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2003 11:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024