It is in your opinion outright wrong. Unless you have attained all knowledge that is a strong statement, when you have only evidence to say that based on our limited knowledge of the past i have come to the conclusion that the biblical account of the flood is wrong. You are making a statement of faith. Which you have told me is not allowed.
There are a great many more things to learn about our earth, with the very small amount of data we have (in comparison to the amount out there yet uncollected) we must be very aarogant, creationist and evolutionist alike to think that we could draw any valid conclusions. Or am i out to lunch again?
quote:
Yes, when you realize that the flood didn't happen
You do not know the flood did not happen. You would conclude as such. Again here is a foolish statement like you would see me making, being very bull headed. We seem much alike in this department.
please forgive me if you found that offensive, it was not meant in such a manner.
------------------
saved by grace