Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does the Book of Mormon contradict the Bible?
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 181 of 352 (534716)
11-10-2009 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by Michamus
11-10-2009 11:50 AM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Michamus writes:
Not even the NT agrees with you on this one.
That's not the NT. That's a verse from the NT. But seeing as we're slinging verses around, there's this other verse from the NT
quote:
1 Thess: 2We always thank God for all of you, mentioning you in our prayers. 3We continually remember before our God and Father your work produced by faith, your labor prompted by love, and your endurance inspired by hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.
If godly faith produces work then what can we conclude about faith that doesn't produce work. Might we conclude as James concludes? That such a faith is actually dead? Ungodly? Useless?
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 11:50 AM Michamus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 12:50 PM iano has not replied

  
Michamus
Member (Idle past 5187 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 182 of 352 (534723)
11-10-2009 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by iano
11-10-2009 12:01 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Indeed. We are agreed then. Faith without works is meaningless. So Faith alone cannot save you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by iano, posted 11-10-2009 12:01 PM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by ochaye, posted 11-10-2009 1:40 PM Michamus has not replied
 Message 185 by kbertsche, posted 11-10-2009 4:10 PM Michamus has not replied

  
ochaye
Member (Idle past 5268 days)
Posts: 307
Joined: 03-08-2009


Message 183 of 352 (534732)
11-10-2009 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by Michamus
11-10-2009 12:50 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
quote:
Faith without works is meaningless.
Faith cannot exist without works. No works, no faith. Only works that are of faith are pleasing to God.
To work to be justified is to reject Christ, and to be destroyed. Those who do not know that they are justified cannot be in Christ. Those who know about Christ but are unjustified will be destroyed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 12:50 PM Michamus has not replied

  
kbertsche
Member (Idle past 2161 days)
Posts: 1427
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Joined: 05-10-2007


Message 184 of 352 (534751)
11-10-2009 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by Michamus
11-10-2009 11:50 AM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
quote:
"Grace only" is a recent Lutheran Doctrine. Sadly it is about as well founded in scripture as the trinity.
Not so. As I explained at the end of Message 175, it is a New Testament doctrine and was accepted as such by the early church.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 11:50 AM Michamus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 4:54 PM kbertsche has seen this message but not replied

  
kbertsche
Member (Idle past 2161 days)
Posts: 1427
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Joined: 05-10-2007


Message 185 of 352 (534752)
11-10-2009 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by Michamus
11-10-2009 12:50 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
quote:
Indeed. We are agreed then. Faith without works is meaningless.
I agree that faith without works is dead (i.e. lifeless, powerless).
quote:
So Faith alone cannot save you.
This does not logically follow as a conclusion to the statement above.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 12:50 PM Michamus has not replied

  
Michamus
Member (Idle past 5187 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 186 of 352 (534754)
11-10-2009 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by kbertsche
11-10-2009 4:04 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Sadly I missed this explanation somehow.
Even more sadly, the part about Paul is unfounded (despite it's marked popularity among protestants)
quote:
Rom 4:4
To the one working, the wage is not reckoned according to grace but according to obligation
Paul is clearly stating a correlation here between Salvation, and employment. Paul emphasizes the obligation of labor in order to meet the requirement of his wage, and that grace has no part in it.
Paul goes even further in Chapter 3:
quote:
Rom. 3:28
a man is justified by faith apart from works of the law.
This is another clear example that faith, and works are two separate and requisite items for justification (salvation).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by kbertsche, posted 11-10-2009 4:04 PM kbertsche has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by ochaye, posted 11-10-2009 5:42 PM Michamus has replied

  
ochaye
Member (Idle past 5268 days)
Posts: 307
Joined: 03-08-2009


Message 187 of 352 (534756)
11-10-2009 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Michamus
11-10-2009 4:54 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
quote:
This is another clear example that faith, and works are two separate and requisite items for justification (salvation).
I think I'll go and watch Bugs Bunny. He's funnier.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 4:54 PM Michamus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 8:41 PM ochaye has replied

  
Michamus
Member (Idle past 5187 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 188 of 352 (534768)
11-10-2009 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by ochaye
11-10-2009 5:42 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Excellent retort! I especially enjoyed your immersion in scripture and logic!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by ochaye, posted 11-10-2009 5:42 PM ochaye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by ochaye, posted 11-11-2009 6:29 AM Michamus has not replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 189 of 352 (534775)
11-10-2009 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by kbertsche
09-16-2009 8:46 PM


Court of Appeals
Hi, KBertsche.
I changed my mind: I'm back in.
kbertsche writes:
Bluejay writes:
The simple fact is that, despite the incessant hounding of born-again Christians, no Christian on the planet believes in salvation by grace alone. Not one. Every single one of us believes that salvation is, at least in part, contingent on man.
Sorry, but what you say is clearly false.
So, then, it's your position that every person in the world is saved? If not, what is it that separates the "saved" from the "not saved"?
-----
KBertsche writes:
I stand by my statement that good works are absolutely not a means of salvation...
Then I refer you to the previous message from Ochaye (524230):
ochaye writes:
There is no argument that works are not necessary for salvation.
As long as these two mutually contradictory positions are held by two non-Mormons on this thread, your argument that my position on the issue is non-biblical has no credibility.
-----
kbertsche writes:
Bluejay writes:
Matthew 14:12
This reference seems to be a typo?
Yep, it sure is. But, I can't remember now what reference I originally wanted. Guess I've only got three instead.
-----
kbertsche writes:
Bluejay writes:
Matthew 19:17
Read the rest of the story!
Earlier on this thread, you were arguing that it didn't matter what the rest of the New Testament said, as long as the BoM said the opposite of what one scripture said.
Now, you're complaining about me taking things out of context.
Normal humans would be experiencing a phenomenon called "cognitive dissonance" at this point.
-----
kbertsche writes:
The point is that it is impossible to gain salvation by doing good deeds--one can never do enough good to ensure salvation.
No, it isn't. It goes like this:
Man: "I did X: what else do I have to do to get into heaven?"
Jesus: "Do Y. And Z. Then, you'll get into heaven."
Note that Jesus didn't answer, "Nothing: nothing you do will ever get you into heaven." That's what He would have to have said in order for the story to mean what you interpret it to mean. Instead, He told the man that doing Y and Z would get him into heaven.
And, verse 29 (NIV) says:
quote:
Everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
Jesus says, "If you do X, you get eternal life, where X = leave family or belongings for me." Since "leaving family or belongings" is something a person does, and "something a person does" is the operational definition of "works," Jesus just said that works get people into eternal life.
And, in order to avoid any potential further confusion, "eternal life" is generally what Mormons mean when we say, "salvation."
It seems pretty clear to me.
-----
kbertsche writes:
Bluejay writes:
1 Cor. 3:13-15
This directly argues against your claim! Verse 15 says that some will be saved even though their works are burned up.
Here's the scripture (NIV) with surrouding verses for context:
quote:
11 For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.
12 If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, 13 his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man's work.
14 If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward.
15 If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.
What reward is received by the man whose work survives the fire, and lost by the man whose work does not survive the fire?
In Mormonism (and in some other sects, I understand), we define two types of "salvation": salvation from physical death (resurrection), and salvation from spiritual death. Salvation from physical death is free for all men (i.e. all men go to "heaven"); but, salvation from spiritual death requires works (i.e. only those who fulfill the works requirement go to the "best heaven," where God is).
To me, that's the "reward" 1 Corinthians 3 mentions. What is your opinion as to what the "reward" is?
-----
kbertsche writes:
Sorry, but what you say is false. What we have been explaining is the historic Christian faith.
Paul taught in the first century that salvation was not on the basis of good works.
And, before Paul taught that (granting, for the sake of argument, that you are right about this), Jesus taught that doing X will get people into eternal life, where X = a type of work.
So, I'm sorry, but what you say is false: the historic Christian faith was a faith of salvation by works.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by kbertsche, posted 09-16-2009 8:46 PM kbertsche has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by kbertsche, posted 11-11-2009 12:21 PM Blue Jay has replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 190 of 352 (534776)
11-10-2009 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by iano
11-10-2009 11:32 AM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Hi, Iano.
iano writes:
My own view wouldn't agree with you either...
I suppose I overgeneralized. I didn't think it would matter, because I didn't think anyone else was going to read this thread.
My apologies.
-----
iano writes:
Bluejay writes:
The Bible contains a repetitive formula: If you do X, you get Y
Therein lies a rather big clue leading one to conclude salvation by grace alone.
Except that the scriptures I listed have X="good works" and Y="salvation."
To me, that's a rather big clue leading one to conclude salvation not by grace alone.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by iano, posted 11-10-2009 11:32 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by iano, posted 11-11-2009 7:27 AM Blue Jay has replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 191 of 352 (534779)
11-10-2009 11:32 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by ochaye
09-15-2009 5:14 AM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Hi, Ochaye.
ochaye writes:
There is no argument that works are not necessary for salvation.
Good. Then we are in complete agreement.
I'm still not sure why you're going on about justification when this entire sub-topic has been about salvation. Come to think of it, I've never really been clear on what "justification" means in this context (it isn't a term we use much, if ever, in the LDS church).
But, regardless of what "justification" means, I again refer you to James 2:24, which says the exact opposite of your argument about whatever "justification" means:
quote:
You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone. (NIV)
-----
ochaye writes:
It does not matter how much the BoM says that salvation is free, etc. It is just so much camouflage on a loaded artillery piece, sugar on a poison pill. It's double-talk worthy of the Qur'an.
So, what the BoM says does not matter in a discussion about what the BoM says?
I'm sure this makes perfect sense to you, given the coherency of your previous arguments.

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by ochaye, posted 09-15-2009 5:14 AM ochaye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by ochaye, posted 11-11-2009 6:39 AM Blue Jay has not replied

  
ochaye
Member (Idle past 5268 days)
Posts: 307
Joined: 03-08-2009


Message 192 of 352 (534804)
11-11-2009 6:29 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Michamus
11-10-2009 8:41 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Quite. 'Enjoyed' isn't quite the word, is it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Michamus, posted 11-10-2009 8:41 PM Michamus has not replied

  
ochaye
Member (Idle past 5268 days)
Posts: 307
Joined: 03-08-2009


Message 193 of 352 (534806)
11-11-2009 6:39 AM
Reply to: Message 191 by Blue Jay
11-10-2009 11:32 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
quote:
I'm still not sure why you're going on about justification when this entire sub-topic has been about salvation.
Salvation comes only to those who are justified. One cannot be justified without knowing it.
What is justification? Being accounted just, righteous. One can be accounted righteous before men, or before God. People are justified before men by works, before God by faith. The NT refers to both.
quote:
So, what the BoM says does not matter in a discussion about what the BoM says?
On the contrary. Has it taken all this time to come up with a daft reply like that? Surely not.
Try harder, worker.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Blue Jay, posted 11-10-2009 11:32 PM Blue Jay has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by Michamus, posted 11-11-2009 9:43 AM ochaye has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 194 of 352 (534815)
11-11-2009 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by Blue Jay
11-10-2009 11:10 PM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
Bluejay writes:
Except that the scriptures I listed have X="good works" and Y="salvation."
I'm aware of that, and agree there are many verses which say such a thing.
To me, that's a rather big clue leading one to conclude salvation not by grace alone.
That's one conclusion you could arrive at - a kind of skimming the surface, simplistic conclusion. If you were to add an obvious piece of information to the pot however, a piece of information that everyone has at their disposal, then you'd quickly arrive at the opposite conclusion.
C'mon Bluejay, you're a sinner, you're smart. It shouldn't be that difficult.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Blue Jay, posted 11-10-2009 11:10 PM Blue Jay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Michamus, posted 11-11-2009 9:46 AM iano has replied
 Message 199 by Blue Jay, posted 11-11-2009 1:42 PM iano has replied

  
Michamus
Member (Idle past 5187 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 195 of 352 (534833)
11-11-2009 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by ochaye
11-11-2009 6:39 AM


Re: Bluejay's Closing Remarks
ochaye writes:
The NT refers to both.
Then reference those scriptures. How hard is it? You have made 58 posts on this thread (so far) and not a single one makes any direct scripture reference.
I don't know about you ochaye, but I really don't take very many people's "word on it".
Reference the scriptures, and then state what you think they mean.
I have a feeling though that you don't (and won't) do this for a few reasons.
1. Maybe you don't know the Bible (or it's sub-library the New Testament) as well as you say you do, so you avoid citing scripture and opt for sermon-like posts.
2. Perhaps you are just trolling this thread in hopes of a hollow victory.
3. Or, maybe you just don't want to adhere to any solid scripture reference, as they have been dissected and analyzed already by several of the poster's here, and you might be presented with an argument uncomfortable to you. This also prevents you from easily morphing your own position.
I could spend all day thinking of reasons you don't do this simple and intellectually honest function. That more than likely won't change how you participate though, as you more than likely are convinced your debate style is proper, else you certainly wouldn't be employing it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by ochaye, posted 11-11-2009 6:39 AM ochaye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by ochaye, posted 11-11-2009 10:32 AM Michamus has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024