Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Open letter to conservatives
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 88 of 122 (566436)
06-24-2010 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Artemis Entreri
06-24-2010 4:09 PM


Re: affecting me
you sound like Oni now.
I am Oni now, and then, and later too. I think you meant this for CS. You're just full of confusions, dude.
you both know what I am saying, but wanna debate how I am saying
No dude, you just need to be specific and clear when you explain something. This is a debate forum, so yes, we'll debate you on what you said. If you're going to get snippy about it then maybe you should save your comments and posts for youtube.
Your initial comments, as a conservative, made it seem like you held a different set of opinions for what happens in Virginia as opposed to Cali. Conservatives tend to do that. But on the two subjects you happened to give as examples (same-sex marriage and abortion) it didn't seem like you should have held two different opinions.
I commented on this and all you had to do was clarify it. You're on a debate forum, it's what happens here.
fuck abortion is homocide to me. like you had no clue what I meant.
I still don't have a clue what you mean. You sound retarded to me.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Artemis Entreri, posted 06-24-2010 4:09 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 90 of 122 (566442)
06-24-2010 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Artemis Entreri
06-24-2010 4:28 PM


Re: mostly for CS, Qni, and DR.A
I am no longer a pothead, thank you. That was years ago. But would like to legally do it one day in the future.
Hey I didn't mean that in a bad way. You can smoke it legally...in California.
So you are just being a bitch about it, and they are not. I called it right the 1st time, thanks for at least admitting that you like to be mean to me.
I'm sorry if I was mean to you, I promise to be gentle from now on. I'm not being a bitch, I think they are as confused to what you mean as I am. Hyro agreed with me, Dr. A has asked you a few questions pertaining to it also, and CS and you actually disagree. But this has all become clear due to my bitchyness I guess.
Non-comics!?!, what is required to be a comic? Is there a degree or school required for it, or are comics just people who refer to themselves as comics? Anyone can or cannot be a comic.
Comprehension is not your strong suit, is it? Ok, I'll help you out.
What I meant is, you used the term Carlos MenSTEALia, suggesting that Carlos steals material, right? You got that because of Rogan's video, the one he shot at the Laugh Factory in LA, right? So now the label of "theif" has stuck to Carlos. You used it as though you knew what it refered to and why they called him that. You also used it as a non-comic would, WE don't use that term. Carlos, to comics who know comedy, is NOT a theif - sans a few personal issues certain comics have with each other. And mind you, I say this not liking him personally either.
The joke Rogan chose to nail Mencia on was not Carlos's joke, that's well known, but it wasn't Artie Fletchers either, the comic Rogan claimed wrote it. There were tons of comics at that time doing that bit, not verbatum, but very similar. This is not considered stealing in the comedy world, it's considered doing "hack" material.
The only comic that has ever stolen material out-right, verbatum was Denis Leary.
Is there a degree or school required for it, or are comics just people who refer to themselves as comics? Anyone can or cannot be a comic.
- True, all you need is an alcohol dependancy and to be very self-absorbed. Oh, and some jokes... but sometimes not even that.
Its okay that your material is not unique, nor created by yourself.
I haven't done any material. Believe me, save your hate for when you actually hear it or see it.
Don't worry, it's ok, you can still be unoriginal and funny at the same time.
Like MenSTEALia?
BTW I don’t think I am in the know about a bunch of losers like comics.
No argument there.
I looked murder up for you and CS the semantics assholes.
You might want to look up homicide too.
I was wrong to say murder
...and you are wrong to say homicide also.
I see your game
Yes, it's all a plot to destroy you. Damn, the jig is up guys. AE has discovered that we are all out to get him through the use of semantical arguments. Clever, very clever of you, AE.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Artemis Entreri, posted 06-24-2010 4:28 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 113 of 122 (566645)
06-25-2010 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by dronestar
06-25-2010 3:31 PM


Re: defense spending
I keep asking why Americans aren't angered by all this.
Are you not watching So You Think You Can Dance and America's got Talent...? It's there for a reason you know...
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by dronestar, posted 06-25-2010 3:31 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by dronestar, posted 06-25-2010 3:50 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 117 of 122 (566659)
06-25-2010 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by dronestar
06-25-2010 3:50 PM


Re: defense spending
If I write it one million times, do you think I'll remember it?
Maybe...
But it does ring true, which is actually the part that angers me the most. It's not the spending, I don't knock the Defence Industry for doing their job. I don't knock anyone for attempting to make money. What bothers me is the efforts made to distract Americans so they won't concern themselves with the spending. That, to me, is what should be cause for concern. That, to me, is what's worse.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by dronestar, posted 06-25-2010 3:50 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by dronestar, posted 06-25-2010 4:08 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 119 of 122 (566667)
06-25-2010 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by dronestar
06-25-2010 4:08 PM


Re: defense spending
I know it is an over the top Hollywood movie, but if you ever saw the salespeople at weapons production sales conferences, it would turn your stomach to know such people DO exist. Those war-salesmen / war-production-lobbyists sicken me.
I've seen it, good movie.
Yeah, lobbyist in general sicken me, I agree on that point. But if that's how someone chooses to make a living, while I don't find it honorable, and in fact find it despicable, I won't knock 'em for it. If not them then someone else will do it; it doesn't seem worth it to bother with individuals when it's the entire system that's at fault.
However, I do knock those who allow it to exist. Who distract Americans so that we as a people won't say anything. Who use the lobbyist for their own personal gain. Because, the fact of the matter is these are elected officials who are doing that. That really pisses me off.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by dronestar, posted 06-25-2010 4:08 PM dronestar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024